Why Law Firms Shouldn’t do Forensics

Here’s a good reason why law firms, even when they have qualified people in house, shouldn’t get started in the business of forensic collections. You never, ever have every hard drive connector you need. With all the various types of drives in use now in laptops, (IDE, SATA, Ultra-ATA/PATA, Zif connectors, SSD drives) let alone all the various types of smartphones or netbooks on the market now, or that will be coming on the market, there’s simply no way a business that doesn’t have collection as it’s main focus is going to be able to keep up with all the different types of equipment and know-how required to do the job.

Personally, I’ve had a couple of laptop drives come in over the last couple of years that I simply don’t have a connector for, and had never really worked with.

Since law firm’s IT personnel are not just in the forensics business, they won’t be able to do every type of collection. If they have to explain why they can collect one type of drive, but not another, to an attorney who has no idea there are different types of drives, who then has to go back and explain to a client why they had to pay for a vendor for this drive, but not that one, things are not going to go smoothly. It’s probably better to just avoid it altogether.

At least that’s my opinion. 🙂

Similar Posts

  • Quick Thought – What Does Your Organization Celebrate?

    Recently I was logged in to a webinar and one of the presenters starting talking about his company’s long history of going above and beyond. Things like driving all night with hardware in the trunk of their car, or the countless all-nighters people have pulled to write scripts or deal with ridiculous deadlines and tough…

  • Technology in the Courtroom

    This article was being passed around on the Yahoo LitSupport mailing list, and since it specifically talks about a program that we have used, albeit in very limited capacities, in trials before, it really caught my eye as something to pass around the firm. Jurors and Technology in Trial: What Were Once Vices Are Now…

  • Lit Support Links (weekly)

    Expediting E-Discovery Before Meet & Confer Conferences tags: LitSupport MM What the Market Really Wants From E-Discovery Software tags: LitSupport MM eDiscovery Careers: Achieving Success as a Non-Attorney in a Law Firm: Make Yourself Critical tags: LitSupport MM Staying ‘Above the Fray’ in Litigation tags: LitSupport MM The No Fly Zone of Producing An Entire…

  • | |

    Speaking of ILTA

    The conference session schedule was released today, an yup, not only will I be attending, I’ll be speaking a couple of times as well. In looking over the details, obviously I’m drawn to the Litigation Support sessions at first, and frankly, I’m a little underwhelmed by the titles. Seems like some of the same topics…

  • Links (weekly)

    When a Party Requests Native Files…. tags: MM LitSupport Marketing a Litigation Support / eDiscovery Department within a Law Firm: Getting New Customers, Part 4 tags: LitSupport MM Levels: Getting the Professional ‘Pop’ tags: Photography MM Maryland Law Firm Loses Medical Data tags: LitSupport MM Security Marketing a Litigation Support / eDiscovery Department within a…

  • |

    Linked: Craig Ball on Processing

    Have you ever wanted a place to point someone to read to help them understand what actually happens when we talk about “processing” documents as part of eDiscovery? I know I have, and I’ve struggled to know where to start when someone says to me “What do you process the documents?” You could do a…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)