Movie time

Angela and I capped off her birthday weekend with a trip to the movies today. Queen of the Damned was the choice for today, and let me tell you, it was not a good one. First off, let me say this, Aaliyah as Akasha and Stuart Townsend as Lestat were very good. Much better than I expected. Too bad they got wrapped into such a horrible story! Now let me preface this by saying I have read the Vampire Chronicles, and this is not just a “the movie wasn’t as good as the book” reaction to the movie. No, I expected that going in, it’s true 95% of the time so it wouldn’t have surprised me if it were true in this case. But most of those movies take one of 2 plans. Either they keep the story in tact, or they pick out parts of it and only show that. In this case, one of those would have been preferable to making references to storylines that you don’t go on to explain. When Akasha says she is going to see Maharet to “settle an old score”, you would expect the movie to describe what that score is, wouldn’t you? You’d be wrong, in fact you’d be wrong if you were looking for any explanation of where Akasha and Maharet came from. They are just “there”. As are a handful of other ‘ancients” who show up towards the end of the movie with Maharet but are never explained nor introduced.

For those of you who are fans of the books, let me tell you that most of the story is taken from The Vampire Lestat, not what you would think from the title. Very little of the movie’s story is taken from The Queen of the Damned, just the character of Akasha, in a very superficial way. The rest of the history of the vampire race, is referenced in some off the cuff comments, (like Akasha’s above, or the coven line “All of the ancients were burnt up years ago”) but completely ignored on the whole. That’s rather lame, because it was that part of the story that I truly wanted to see, and which most Anne Rice fans will want to see. That will be disappointing to them, and the hard core among them will be truly angry over this portrayal, I imagine.

I’d advise you to pass on this one, it will only leave you disappointed. And I’ll tell you that in this case, not only is the book better, but the book is the only story that makes any sense, so read that instead.

Similar Posts

  • Doc does it again!

    Since he explains and links to things about the Hollings bill, and the internet radio fees better than I ever will, go over to Doc Searls’ site and get all the latest information about these horrible laws! He does a wonderful job of keeping us all informed about this stuff on a regular basis, but…

  • Morning reading

    Some things I’ve been looking at. PC Magazine’s Top 100 Websites. They even offer a download that sticks them in your IE favorites for you, or you can just grab the HTML file and import into other browsers. Looks like there might be some interesting finds in there. Doc points to Suits and Geeks, which…

  • Pics up, must get sleep

    Put up my Gnomedex Album. Had a great time at the party tonight. Met and hung out with Tanya and Jerry, who work for a company I promised not to link to yet. They actually learned so much about website development at Gnomedex that they want to go home and redo a bunch of their…

  • Tip of the Week

    This is actually the topic of my weekly email to the staff at work, something interesting that I discovered yesterday. One of my users was trying to send a mail list to one of our vendors. She had it saved as an Excel file with over 4000 records. The file was over 2MB in size….

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)