Outlook

The first bit of Office that I looked at was Outlook 2003. I spent a good portion of late Saturday night/Sunday morning learning about the differences and features. It took a little while to adjust to the 3 panes-across layout as opposed to the 1 pane on the left, two panes over top of each other on the right layout of 2000, but once I got used to it, I like it. The left pane looks a little busy, but the right pane allows you to see more of the message. On top of that, Outlook 2003 actually blocks HTML scripting and some images by default so it’s probably safer to actually use the preview pane! 🙂

Of course all those legit newsletters you get that use banner advertising are probably going to have to adjust and go to text ads, because all the folks using Outlook 2003 are never going to see the banner ads. (For my test I looked at Lockergnome’s Windows Daily, and the banner that usually appears across the top of the message, is blocked.) That’s not necessarily a bad thing..

The other new things I liked are the ability to add “search folders” which let you search for messages and then lump them all together in one folder, keeping that folder handy for when you want to go back and reference those messages again, without actually moving the messages out of whatever folder they currently exist in. You can also display messages in a folder by size, time, date, author, conversation, flag type, etc. Much more powerful than 2000, and the ability to define your own “flag” scheme also gives you many more options than 2000 does in sorting and handling your email. All good stuff, and stuff that I think will change the way some people handle their email. Of course not everyone needs or wants this much power, but it’s nice to know it’s an option. Options are good. 🙂

The sad truth is, I don’t get enough email to tell how much use I would get out of some of these features. *L*

The one down side, at least on my system, is that it seems to be quite a bit slower at checking mail and downloading messages at startup than 2000 is. But that may just be the difference between systems, I have 2000 at work, 2003 at home, it’s hardly an apples to apples comparison.

Anyway, back to regular work now.

Similar Posts

  • What’s possible?

    Saw this posted on Scoble’s link blog this morning, a post from Ernie the Attorney, titled Productivity with Technology: Figuring out what’s possible is the hard part about how simply not knowing what you can do with your technology is an obstacle to increased productivity. I’ve seen many similar situations in my office where people,…

  • I’m not trying to say anything bad about my readers…

    Since I announced that extra $$ from the Amazon links would be going to Prevent Child Abuse, I’ve had 47 people click through to Amazon from here, which is quite higher than normal, but not a single one of them actually ordered anything. You do all realize that you have to actually buy something for…

  • w.bloggar

    The last post I made to the Child Abuse blog was made using the w.bloggar tool. It’s a nice little tool but there’s one big drawback to using it with Blogger Pro. There’s no title field on new posts? What’s up with that? Maybe the new, currently being beta-tested, version of blogger will fix that…

  • More tech woes

    Yesterday was almost an entire day trudging through the world of faulty DNS records, broken telephone cords, unexplained inability to dial outside, which just as suddenly started working again, a lost internet connection that kept me from updating our website database, and various other semi-emergencies. I was so busy putting out fires that when 3PM…

  • Why Training Matters for Retention

    This brings me to that final point. Having a learning culture requires a plan for each employee and for different types of jobs. It requires coordination between the official training department, managers, HR, and the subject matter experts throughout the organization. It may look a bit messy. It may include some mix of internal training, external resources, job shadowing, self-study, and group learning. I’d argue that a true culture that promotes and encourages learning would leave open all of those possibilities. I’d also argue that your training staff isn’t just there to teach classes but to provide and coordinate all of those options. They are there to “provide opportunities to learn and grow”, whatever those look like for all of your employees who wish to do so. They are key to retention but they cannot do it alone. The culture must reward and encourage learning and growth in meaningful ways or all the training staff in the world won’t make a difference. 

  • I’m not the only one

    I’m not the only one taking a deeper look at the rantings and ravings of various tech sites about the Windows 2000 SP3 EULA. Take a look at Fred Langa’s new InformationWeek article. The important part of the EULA left out of other reports: If you choose to utilize the update features within the OS…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)