One more interesting Postini thing

The reports I can pull include a report on traffic by recipient, which includes email addressed to accounts that don’t exist. The woman who used to be listed as our website’s contact when you did a Whois search hasn’t worked here in almost 4 years. Her address was last accesible by doing a Whois more than 3 years ago. There have been over 800 emails addressed to her that came in this last week. Her email address has been undeliverable for almost 4 years, yet she still gets more spam than anyone else here who’s address is active. This shows me two things:

One, that Whois information, at least before safeguards were put in place, was a popular place to collect addresses for spammers.

Two, that bouncing emails for bad addresses has no effect whatsoever on stopping spam.

Similar Posts

  • Surreal

    There’s nothing that says “Be prepared for anything today!” better than driving to work in the quiet that comes from having a bunch of snow on the ground, passing two stopped cars, blocking two lanes of traffic, who obviously had just had an accident, although there was no noticeable damage to either car, so I…

  • What’s coming?

    Now that even hotmail is letting you choose to not display images in email is the banner ad in email a lost cause? And if so, will services like Yahoo! Groups, which inserts a banner in all the list emails sent throught their lists, have to start charging or switch to text ads only? Follow…

  • Tech chatting

    Kevin has the latest episode of his In The Trenches podcast up on his site. I quite enjoyed being part of the Tech Chat with Kevin, Kevin Mazur and Eric Maynard, chatting about the difficulties of dealing with dissimilar systems on your network. Eric put his show prep notes on his site, and I have…

  • Morning News:

    Looking at a rather busy day today, I have to run out of the office to testify at a hearing later, so that takes a big chunk out of my work day. (No I really can’t discuss the hearing other than to say that I am just a witness, it’s not a hearing that directly…

  • Morning news items

    Thanks to Andy for the pointer to Microsoft’s patch for the Secure Sockets problem that they claimed before wasn’t a big deal. Oh well, at least they did patch it! (Note the Win 2000 version of the patch is not available yet.) Doc has written up his Linux Journal article about his talk at Gnomedex….

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)