MS Anti-spyware

I’ve been linking early reactions to the beta of Microsoft’s anti-spyware tool over on the link blog. I haven’t had a chance to download it yet, but perhaps later today I’ll find some time. (I worked out my work schedule to be home today to meet the gas meter-reader guy to try and get the gas company’s “calculation” corrected, and naturally I wind up getting a cold and being home sick anyway!)

Anyway, back to the point. The one thing I’m waiting for on this tool is how MS plans on licensing it. I’ve found myself nodding in agreement while reading some of Ed Bott’s points on this subject. I don’t think MS should be looking at charging for this. I think it should be a core part of the OS. Here’s why:

If MS can get anti-spyware built into future versions of the OS, and available via Automatic Updates for existing versions, the entire market for spyware will eventually dry up. Yes, I know a lot of people will never get the patch, that’s being proved every day, but eventually all of these people will buy a new PC, with a new OS version, with the anti-spyware tool built in. Long-term, spyware makers won’t be able to get their stuff on Windows PC’s and keep it there with any sort of regularity, because Windows will be actively working to keep the PC clean. You won’t need legislation and law enforcement to make the spyware market be unprofitable, technology, assuming it’s done correctly, could take care of it. Charging for it means a whole bunch of people won’t bother paying for it, and the market won’t dry up and IT folks will still be spending time cleaning up small office and home PC’s infected with spyware!

On the other hand, MS could get the tech wrong, spyware makers could and probably will adjust to use different vulnerabilities, and any number of new nastiness will show up over the next few years. But, MS has the chance to give us all hope by making this anti-spyware tool available for free, and getting it spread as widely as possible. Let’s hope they do exactly that!

Update: Then, of course, something I didn’t address directly, how does bundling an anti-spyware app create more legal trouble for MS? Check the bottom of this post from Spud for details.

Similar Posts

  • A little more politics..

    Which is the more offensive, or just plain stupid quote from this story?: Dick Gephardt: “When I’m president, we’ll do executive orders to overcome any wrong thing the Supreme Court does tomorrow or any other day,” (ed. note: this is the one getting big play on blogs today, because it’s obviously a total disregard for…

  • What I’m Sharing (weekly)

    On-Premise Tech’s Swan Song? Pandemic Places Greater Emphasis on the Cloud Zoom needs to clean up its privacy act What You Don’t Know Will Hurt You: Technology Competence in the Time of COVID-19 Privacy Tip #232 – Spam Phone Calls Rampant for Remote Workers – a lot of us may get more calls on our…

  • Interesting

    A little bit of knowledge I picked up reading Coercion by Douglas Rushkoff last night. According to him the US is the only developed nation that does not make teaching media literacy a requirement in its schools. That says soo much about the media in this country that I can’t even begin to talk about…

  • Bloglines subscribers

    Sometime over the weekend, the number of people who subscribe to this blog using Bloglines hit 100. Now, I realize that isn’t a big total compared to some other places, however the significance of it, for me, is that is just about the same number of actual visits to the page on a daily basis….

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.