MS Anti-spyware

I’ve been linking early reactions to the beta of Microsoft’s anti-spyware tool over on the link blog. I haven’t had a chance to download it yet, but perhaps later today I’ll find some time. (I worked out my work schedule to be home today to meet the gas meter-reader guy to try and get the gas company’s “calculation” corrected, and naturally I wind up getting a cold and being home sick anyway!)

Anyway, back to the point. The one thing I’m waiting for on this tool is how MS plans on licensing it. I’ve found myself nodding in agreement while reading some of Ed Bott’s points on this subject. I don’t think MS should be looking at charging for this. I think it should be a core part of the OS. Here’s why:

If MS can get anti-spyware built into future versions of the OS, and available via Automatic Updates for existing versions, the entire market for spyware will eventually dry up. Yes, I know a lot of people will never get the patch, that’s being proved every day, but eventually all of these people will buy a new PC, with a new OS version, with the anti-spyware tool built in. Long-term, spyware makers won’t be able to get their stuff on Windows PC’s and keep it there with any sort of regularity, because Windows will be actively working to keep the PC clean. You won’t need legislation and law enforcement to make the spyware market be unprofitable, technology, assuming it’s done correctly, could take care of it. Charging for it means a whole bunch of people won’t bother paying for it, and the market won’t dry up and IT folks will still be spending time cleaning up small office and home PC’s infected with spyware!

On the other hand, MS could get the tech wrong, spyware makers could and probably will adjust to use different vulnerabilities, and any number of new nastiness will show up over the next few years. But, MS has the chance to give us all hope by making this anti-spyware tool available for free, and getting it spread as widely as possible. Let’s hope they do exactly that!

Update: Then, of course, something I didn’t address directly, how does bundling an anti-spyware app create more legal trouble for MS? Check the bottom of this post from Spud for details.

Similar Posts

  • Shared Links (weekly) Dec. 20, 2020

    I’m leaving as CEO due to mental health Five Must-Read eDiscovery Cases from 2020 Microsoft Wants You to Ditch Your Passwords in 2021 Simple Considerations for Not-So-Simple Search Term Translation Five Common Mistakes In Keyword Search: How Many Do You Make? How To Be Open With Your Boss About Your Mental Health: 4 Tips It’s Never…

  • More on Scoble’s aggregator blog

    Looks like Kunal has come up with a solution for Robert’s aggregator blog that should keep everyone happy: “His new version will post titles, and some text from the body, and post that. Only a small portion, though, not the entire text.” That’s excellent, I was really worried that he would switch over to a…

  • Google to the rescue

    I thought I had broken my MP3 player. Actually, at first I thought there was something wrong with the battery charger. I charged the batteries, put a fresh one in the Muvo and turned it on. It shut right off. I tried another battery, nope. I grabbed a regular AAA instead of the rechargeables, still…

  • Yeah right..

    You know what would rock? If all those people who get bent out of shape if I take more than 5 minutes to respond to their problems could manage to do something that I ask them to within, say, a week! Alas, it appears that is not going to be the case, so my question…

  • Firefox upgrade

    Firefox prompted me to download an update late last nignt. (Or maybe it was early this morning depending on how you view time..) It was the 1.03 release. As that link mentions there was no need to unsintall/reinstall, there are no multiple instances of Firefox listed in Add/Remove programs, all of my current extensions work…

  • Windows Defender again

    I noted last week that it seemed odd that the new definitions I was prompted to download were dated 4 days ago. I’ve been prompted to download 2 updates since then, so obviously, they are updating the def files often. However last night’s definitions were dated Feb. 15, 6 days from the date they were…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)