Similar Posts

  • TechLinks (weekly)

    Google doubles Plus membership with brute-force signup process Can we trust the stats about the number of users and level of engagement with Google +? tags: Tech SocNetPres MM Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here. Follow these topics: Uncategorized

  • Speaking of..

    Speaking of IT folks solving their own problems, Jason has an interesting problem he’s trying to solve with the public wifi hotspots where he works. I don’t have a solution, but I tend to think that if you’re creating public hotpots you don’t worry about neighbors getting access. Of course, maybe that’s just me. Follow…

  • My brain hurts..

    I think maybe I strained a muscle in my cranium somewhere with all this work the last few days. Let’s recap, shall we? In the past few days I’ve added an RSS feed, an Email subscription list, Forum system, downloaded two freeware news aggregators, tested them and wrote up an article reviewing them, spent countless…

  • Stylish

    Gee there’s a whole little Firefox extension that changes styles based on website, etc. that I didn’t even know about until I came across this post about adding attachment icons to Gmail on Download Squad. Why didn’t someone tell me about Stylish? Or did someone tell me and I just forgot? 🙂 Either way, I’m enjoying…

  • In other blogs…

    I haven’t had a lot of spare time to check out other blogs, until today that is. Here’s what I’ve been missing: Paul Boutin on Flashtrack, some sort of popup ad spyware. What sort of idiots think this is a good way to get their message out? Piss off all of your potential customers, that’ll…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)