More MS anti-spyware stuff

Reading a couple of things today about the anti-spyware app got me thinking more about the future of the product, and how a full release will go. There’s two thoughts running right now for me, what I want, and what I’m afraid of.

What I want is it to be free, and part of Windows Update. (see the Malicious Software Removal Tool released this week, for example.) I think that gets the highest level of distribution, and therefore security, as possible.

What I’m afraid of, is that MS will charge for it, and make it a subscription service. This will guarantee the lowest level of distribution, and therefore security, possible aside from not having a tool at all!

In today’s LangaLetter Fred looks into the crystal ball and predicts this:

“My guess is that the Antispyware software will be offered as a “carrot” to entice users of pirated copies into getting a legit version of their OS; and secondarily as a reward to those who have legit copies.”

Comparable to what MS did with Photo Story, correct? Ed Bott doesn’t like that idea:

The whole Genuine Windows program should be reserved for add-ons and fun stuff. Security updates should be available to anyone with as little hassle as possible.” -And I would totally agree with that idea. However, my fear is leading me to contemplate this as a possible compromise position. It goes against the desire to get it to as many Windows users as possible with the least amount of hassle, but it keeps us out of the dreaded “paid subscription” model as well. I might even be persuaded to go along with this method of distribution if MS allowed OEM’s to pre-install it. They are already pre-installing SP2, why not give them the ability to pre-install anti-spyware as a way to get it distributed, and yet still keeping their lame “genuine advantage” junk, since OEM should, by definition, be legal copies of Windows? (All legal issues about pre-installing and monopoly aside.)

It’ll be interesting to see where they come down with this when the beta expires this summer.

Similar Posts

  • Not guilty

    Has reason returned to the land of DMCA? The jury in the Elcomsoft case seems to have decided it should! Here’s the important part of the jury instructions, to my mind: “Merely offering a product that could violate copyrights was not enough to warrant a conviction, the jury instructions said” Haven’t heard that point made…

  • Round up

    Links to interesting things: DDNS Service to block faulty Linksys routers. Yahoo! IM contains security flaw. Keeping it fun -Kevin makes a good point! Lockergnome releases shareware feedreader Follow these topics: Uncategorized

  • | |

    If That’s Not Right, What Else Isn’t?

    I’ve talked before about the things that show up on procedural TV shows (I’m looking at you CSI) that simply aren’t possible in the real world. Think about the number of times you’ve seen a crime drama take a crappy cell phone picture, for example, and using “technology” get a crystal clear image of a…

  • Interesting

    A review of those Microtel/Lindows boxes you can get from Walmart. I think this article gets it right on Linux as a home OS. Until there’s a version of Linux that works “out of the box” it’s not a serious threat to Windows on the consumer front. As of right now, if you want to…

  • Spam fighting

    See, sometimes Microsoft has a good idea . By limiting the number of messages you can send with a free email account, they cut off all those spammers using hotmail accounts to send spam. That would be a good thing, and the 100 messages per day should be plenty for normal users. Really, if you…

  • Well that was fun..

    For those of who who wrote in support of my decision to take away this site as an excuse for THC to not deal with resolving the real problems, thanks. For those of you who think I caved to censorship, well believe whatever you want to, I don’t really care. It’s over for now and…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)