Worth Reading – AI is making journalistic language more repetitive and predictable – and it’s a problem for all of us
/
-
-
Worth Reading – The AI Didn’t Go Rogue. Guardrails Were Never There.
If you don’t put the guardrails in place, you are inviting someone, or some agent, to go rogue. The only difference is that if this were a contractor or an IT person with higher-than-should-be access, you could fall back on their ethics. AI doesn’t have ethics and doesn’t understand the concept. If it can do it, it will do it.
Who’s making sure that what it can do is appropriately limited?
-
Will AI pricing become a charge-back cost to clients?
Maybe we can solve both of those issues this way? We’ll bill you fewer attorney hours by leveraging AI, but you need to foot the bill for its use? Right now, with a set price per seat, the cost of using AI on a given matter is nothing, but it won’t remain that way. It can’t.
Will the legal market make this adjustment to billing back the cost of AI compute? If not, how do firms justify the undefined cost for your firm?
-
Worth Reading – AI’s Economics Don’t Make Sense
I’m cherry-picking the Microsoft note, but the same is true of every AI company out there. Unlimited Copilot interactions cost much, much more than $30 per month in compute costs. Someday, Microsoft and all the other companies will have to change their entire model to show any profit.
-
Worth Reading – Deepfakes: A Problem In Search Of A Problem?
If you ask a group of legal professionals if they’ve seen deepfakes be an issue in court, and they all say no, is there no issue, or did they fall for the fakes?
-
Grammarly Doing Some Creepy AI Stuff
No one gave them permission to create an AI character based on themselves. They just fed some of that person’s writing into the LLM and let it do its thing. There was, apparently, no thought given to whether having a Stephen King-based analyzer would violate the use of his name or if building the LLM would violate his copyright.
