Early impressions

Just finished up with getting my old PC installed in it’s new home, and now that I’m hot and sweaty, I figured I’d sit down and write a bit about what I like/dislike in XP after a few days of using it.

Things I like:

Clear Type -makes the screen so much more eye-friendly, and my now mid-thirties eyes appreciate that!

Completely customizable desktop and start menu! Let’s me put shortcuts where they are most useful to me and let’s me clear the desktop of all icons!

Remote Desktop -will be useful, I’m sure.

Compatibility modes. -I installed all the same software that was on my NT machine with only one patch needed, for Norton, and XP told me where to get the patch! The rest were easily setup to run in whatever OS mode that they are compatible with.

Stability! -it’s slightly better than NT but much better than 98.

Automatic grouping of similar task windows. -Keeps all your IE windows grouped together on the taskbar, for example. (or you can turn that off if you don’t like it)

My Pics screensaver that pulls pictures from My Pictures and makes the screensaver out of them. (Good for my vacation photos!)

Choices on how to handle updates, automatic download and install, automatic download and manual install or manual both. I went with manual on both fronts.

Things I don’t like:

There’s a noticeable delay in opening network resources. (15-30 seconds) I believe NT made the network connection and kept it open all the time, XP seems to be re-opening the connection every time you access a document over it. Nice for local system resources, I’m sure, but not so nice when you’re dealing with a lot of documents in different places on the network.

The Dell Startup process when I first plugged in the machine asked for network settings but when I logged into XP, I had to re-enter those same settings. Where did Dell stick those other ones?

Getting rid of MSN Messenger was a pain! They really embedded it deeply into the OS didn’t they?

I haven’t had to deal with WPA because it’s an OEM license, that would probably be a dislike if it comes down to upgrading current machines that we have to XP, but it’s not one on this machine, so I can’t count it.

Overall I do like it, it seems like XP, contrary to what most people say about Microsoft’s OS’s, gives you plenty of control over your system. You can configure the look and feel to almost anything you like, and run any software you like without having to worry too much about whether there’s an XP compatible version. You can accept default configurations or you can change most of them to suit your own needs. I like having choices, it’s a good thing!

Similar Posts

  • MS Anti-spyware

    I’ve been linking early reactions to the beta of Microsoft’s anti-spyware tool over on the link blog. I haven’t had a chance to download it yet, but perhaps later today I’ll find some time. (I worked out my work schedule to be home today to meet the gas meter-reader guy to try and get the…

  • Why?

    I have a question. If you’re a tech recruiter, or know a tech recruiter can you help me out? I want to know, when you’re a tech recruiter, why do you contact people without even looking at their resume first, and why do you lie about the job you’re calling about? Seriously, last week I…

  • | |

    Linked: Stop Using Internet Explorer

    John is totally right about this, but I’m willing to bet there is at least one law firm out there still using IE because some legacy app only works in IE. “In case you needed another reason to stop using IE, a new bug has been discovered that can take over your entire PC. The…

  • Free beer!

    We had several of our friends over Saturday for a little cook-out. We bought enough beer for everyone and in turn, two of our guests brought even more beer. Now, we’ve got a whole bunch of leftover beer! Do you think my boss would mind if I drank an Amber Bock with my lunch? 😉…

  • | |

    FUD, but not entirely

    Joe Wilcox does a good job of finding the FUD in Microsoft’s 10 reasons not to use Google Apps. I’d have to agree with him that Microsoft’s reasons are pretty dumb. One thing that does jump out at me though, is number 7: Enterprise companies have to constantly think about government regulations and standards?while Google…

  • Linked – You Can’t Make Friends With The Rockstars

    That seems to be what happens in the tech journalism space. We have a list of people who’ve created successful companies and made a ton of money doing it, and everyone is supposed to assume that they are so bright they can do it over and over again. Then we are surprised when Elon buys Twitter and runs it into the ground or when Meta can’t find a market for the Metaverse. Microsoft spends billions upon billions of dollars on AI without any hope of making a profit for years while conducting rounds of layoffs to offset those costs. We assume they know what they’re doing because they’ve succeeded in other markets before, and the press doesn’t challenge them when they say provably false things. 

    It’s the Halo Effect. We assume that successful people are smart and kind and live healthy lives, especially if they are white men. When they contradict this picture we’ve painted, we loathe to admit it, let alone call it out in an interview. It’s more cognitively comfortable for us to continue believing they are competent and will figure it out.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)