Internet Security, eh?

I spent over an hour helping one of the tenants of our office building with an email problem. He explained to me that he couldn’t send email, even though he was receiving email just fine. Figuring this was a server issue, or a simple settings issue, I agreed to go over and check all of his settings and make sure everything was alright before he called his ISP. Like everything in IT, it wasn’t anywhere near that simple. It turned out, after some investigation, that of the three PC’s in his office, one could send email and two couldn’t. All of them had the same server settings. The one that could send email had Norton AV, but had outgoing email scanning turned off. One of the two that couldn’t had Norton AV with outgoing email scanning turned on. Turning off outgoing email scanning set everything back right again. Apparently, the outgoing scanning was taking so long that it caused the connection to their server to timeout. Even increasing the timeout in Outlook didn’t help, so I’m guessing the ISP recently decreased the timeout settings on the other end.

The last PC had Norton’s full Internet Security Suite. Turning off outgoing email scanning in the AV portion did not fix things. Disabling the AV entirely did nothing, the email was still being scanned by something and taking too long. Finally I narrowed it down to the Anti-spam that was scanning outgoing email. There is no setting to tell it to only scan incoming, the only way to stop was to disable the feature completely. (They don’t really need it, they have spam filters at the server level.)

But here’s my question, why is there not an option to disable outgoing scanning by the anti-spam product? Or why is it even a feature of this product anyway? I assume it’s only purpose is to scan for mail being sent by a trojan, since if you’re sending mail, you don’t want it blocked as spam by your own computer! But if your AV product, that is bundled with the anti-spam, is working the way it should, the AV scan should stop that from happening anyway, correct? Or at least the firewall, also bundled in the suite, should be setup to block outgoing connections from trojan mailers. It’s redundant!

Just a thought, anyway.

Similar Posts

  • Photo Contest

    Our local newspaper is running a digital photo contest every week this month. This week’s finalists include a picture by my wife! You too can go over to the The Columbus Dispatch and vote for your favorite. Obviously, my vote is a litle biased. 🙂 She becomes a finalist for the grand prize, and if…

  • |

    Linked – Summer vacations can cause havoc for IT departments

    Every company has workaholics who can’t leave their duties behind when heading out on vacation. They’re kind of worker who, if the hotel doesn’t have Wi-Fi, will rush to the closest coffee shop or eatery to stay connected, check email and jump onto a video conference call. Those are the kinds of insecure wireless networks that…

  • What I’m Sharing (weekly)

    Law firms either keep up with tech or get left behind ‘Scared. Ashamed. Crippled.’: How One Lawyer Overcame Living With Depression in Big Law Understanding Electronic Discovery: Not Just for Biglaw Not If But When: Pulling E-Discovery In-House Interview: Danny Chan of Ricoh on a case study involving Relativity Analytics Information Project 5 Things That…

  • LeBron Mania

    First off, let me just say, I’m really not the world’s biggest basketball fan, it’s no hockey. But I couldn’t help but notice that the “LeBron James era” started last night. Now, keeping in mind that the Cavs are the closest thing we have to a local NBA team, would you be surprised to know…

  • Angela’s blog

    Spent a lot of time last night trying to find a work-around for her blog. Included in that was creating a new blog and seeing if it would publish to the server, but nothing seemed to work. Finally this morning, during a few moments of down time at work (It’s been a busy morning!) I…

  • The real patch

    nf0 was kind enough to post the actual link to the Outlook patch in the forum. Thanks! I was too busy to really look through the news story about it carefully and completely missed the fact that, once again, the news story didn’t provide an actual link to the patch. It would be helpful if…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.