Legal matters..

Since today is a big day, as far as Supreme Court decisions coming out, it’s only fitting that I hit a couple of legal questions.

First, the Supremes did rule that libraries can be forced to use internet filters. Now, personally, I hoped for something better, but thought this would come out this way. (Of course I’m not a legal expert or anything, just a somewhat educated citizen..)The legality of the issue was always going to get caught up in the fact that libraries do choose what to have available and what not to have available in every other media format, so why not make it mandatory to do so with the internet as well? That, I think, is the legal argument that anti-filter forces can’t get around. On the other hand, while it may be constitutional, clearly this is an example of bad law, because filters simply don’t do what they are intended to do very well, and wind up blocking quite a few legitimate information sources.

My guess is the first time a child who is being molested at home and goes to a Public library only to find that he/she can’t access any websites with information about escaping an abusive home because of “keyword” filters, and then she winds up a front page story as either a runaway, or a child death, will be when some serious consideration is given to rewriting the law in the Congress. Unfortunately, current social opinion is that we need to keep pornography from kids at any cost. I don’t think they really think about what the costs might be. Hopefully we never find out.

Secondly, this post about wiretapping laws and recording devices being used in public places is interesting in light of the Dave Matthews concert last week. Dave has a standard policy that anyone can record his live concerts, so there were people at the show with some seriously heavy-duty recording equipment. On top of that, there were plenty of people using their cell phones to let their friends listen in on their favorite songs, etc. On the other hand, no cameras were allowed in at all. I’m betting there were more than 1 cell-phone camera combo’s on hand. My question is, what are the legal complications that are going to come about from all of this mess? Is making a call on your cell during a concert going to be illegal recording of a live event? If you’re given permission to record the event and your equipment picks up random people talking in the audience have you committed an invasion of privacy, or wiretap violation? What if you record their end of a cellphone conversation? If your phone has a cam built in will you have to forfeit it at the gate? Will taking a cell phone that belongs to parents who gave it to their sitter as an emergency number put the venue at legal risk? Or will all of this be written off under the “if you’re in public there is no expectation of privacy”. So whatever is recorded by whomever is fair game then, right? Then why can’t you bring recording devices or cameras into a typical show? There’s going to be some legal cases in this area, don’t you think?

Similar Posts

  • News

    Just a few notes on some things that may, or may not, interest you: Movable Type version 2.6 has been released. You can download the Upgrade version or the full version here. This is where you can find the info on the Mac OS 10.2.4 Update. (link thanks to nfo.) Cafepress is running a coupon…

  • Access and bad news

    The good news? I do have ‘net access in class. The bad news? While surfing towards the end of our lunch break I discovered that the Child Abuse site’s been suspended. I don’t have any idea why, and I don’t have the contact information for the host with me. Of course I also noticed that…

  • More Scoble stuff

    Hmm it seems that Robert has made a few more comments about my posts this morning. Let me counter his feelings bit-by-bit: “sorry, I don’t agree with you that talking generally about the Tablet helps NEC all that much. If you decide to buy a Tablet based upon my comments, but you end up with…

  • What I’m Sharing (weekly)

    Americans want an internet bill of rights to protect their online data/a> Amid Increasing Remote Work, E-Discovery Contends With an Overstretched Internet Will 2020 see the end of Keywords in eDiscovery? An Open Letter From Your Lawyer: We Don’t Know What We’re Doing. Unchecked Smart Cities are Surveillance Cities. What We Need are Smart Enough…

  • |

    Google Killing Off Anonymity

    With recent announcements about Google migrating their privacy policy into one large policy, that lets them share your information across any and all of the Google tools, some folks are starting to get up in arms about Google moving away from their unofficial motto, “Don’t be evil”. Some are even comparing Google’s moves to AOL….

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)