Inflated Costs and Productivity

I will leave it to the fine folks at Stop Blocking! to skewer the latest report about the “cost” of social networking to business.

I really couldn’t do it any better, but I do want to take a moment and do some math for you.

According to the article, the hour each day an employee spends on social networking site costs ““$10,375 of wasted productivity per person annually”. Which is interesting, and sounds really, really scary.

Except it’s completely disconnected from the real world. In the real world, most people do not put in 8 full hours of non-stop productivity in an 8 hour work day. There are bathroom breaks, brief conversations with coworkers, phone calls, emails, getting up and stretching your legs, etc. All of those things occur during the course of the day, and for most of us, a 40 hour work week is pretty laughable. So, if anything, we’re looking at social networking sites either as part of our job, or during down time, or at the expense of our own day being longer. Not at the expense of productivity, and if someone is truly not being productive, then get rid of them no matter what the reason is!

Let’s do our own study. Let’s assume a 4 member team, and a supervisor. For simplicities sake, lets say the team members make $50,000 per year, and the manager make twice that. Every day, once in the morning, and once in the afternoon, the manager does a check on how things are going, what issues are coming up and where she should expect some problems. She has a 5 minute conversation with each employee, twice a day.

That’s 10 minutes of not being productive per employee.

$50,000/52 weeks/40 hours/60 minutes = .40 cents per minute of salary wasted.

.40 x 10 minutes per day = $4.00 x 5 days per week x 52 weeks per year = $1,040 of salary wasted

x 4 employees = $4,160

For the manager, it’s 40 minutes per day at twice the salary, so $1,040 x 4 x 2 = $8,320 per year.

For a grand total of  $12,480 of lost productivity! Good god, let’s ban managers talking to their reports! It’s killing us! Don’t even get me started on meetings, restroom breaks, phone calls or email!

Of course, it’s not, but my quick example makes as much sense as these stupid social networking/productivity studies, doesn’t it?

Similar Posts

  • What Do People Need to be Successful Working From Home? – It Varies

    Why it’s almost as if we should ask individuals what would help them, and within reason, provide that. After all, even within each age group, parents might prioritize something different than single employees, or those sharing an internet connection and space with a spouse or roommates also working from home might prioritize something else. Some may want to adhere to strict 9-5 hours so that they can spend the rest of their time on childcare or side-businesses, while others may value the ability to take a couple of hours during the day for schoolwork and then pick up work again in the evening.

    We would do well to listen to what people need, talk about what we expect, and also understand what we are doing with our own actions.

  • |

    Friendfeed’s Over-Inflated Sense of Self

    Now that Friendfeed has decided to report the number of people who follow you on their service as “subscribers” when it polls an RSS feed, how over-inflated are your subscriber numbers? A couple of folks in the comments there have already pointed out the obvious, being subscribed to someone on Friendfeed, and maybe seeing just…

  • |

    Linked: Women in cybersecurity need more than inspiration

    What Sherri talks about in regards to the security industry is something I’m seeing over and over again when reading about diversity. The child care question.

    Let me share another resource on the topic with you. In December, there was an episode of People I Mostly Admire with Claudia Goldin, where she talked about the concept of “Greedy work”.

    The topic she was chatting about was the gender pay gap and how much child care contributes to it, and one of the reasons we have a gender pay cap, aside from the percentage that is actually discrimination, is that greedy work doesn’t account for child care, but it pays more. So in many families, they have to make a choice between less pay and the flexibility to equally share the child care. The economics of that don’t usually make sense, so one parent takes on the greedy work to maximize the family income while the other steps back to a more flexible role in order to provide the majority of child care. With social norms being what they are, and the other issues that contribute to a gender pay gap, that most often means the man in a heterosexual couple, and here we are with women being vastly underrepresented in these types of positions.

  • | |

    Linked: How to Use RSS Feeds to Boost Your Productivity

    RSS is not gone, quite the opposite. Most people, however, don’t use RSS subscriptions like they did in the old Google Reader days, but RSS is running underneath a whole lot of stuff that we all use every day.

    But, I also want to point out that there are a TON of good reasons to use an RSS reader now. Maybe more than there were when Google still had one. As it is, we’ve sort of grown into this habit of letting social media inform us. If there’s some topic we want to know about, we’ll follow some accounts and let the algorithm decide for us what we need to see.

    Look how well that’s working out.

  • |

    Facebook Improves Pages

    There’s been a lot written about the upgrade to Pages that Facebook is rolling out. As with most things Facebook related, many people either love or hate the new layout. However, to me that’s not the interesting thing, though there is some interest there. No, the interesting thing is the ability to “use Facebook as…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)