Four considerations in selecting and implementing new legal holds technology
tags: LitSupport MM
FTK x Summation: Meet Me at the Crossroads – eDiscovery Insight
tags: LitSupport MM
AccessData releases Summation 5.0 with FTK Forensic Review license included
tags: LitSupport MM
The Gartner 2013 Magic Quadrant for eDiscovery Software is Out!
tags: LitSupport MM
Top 5 e-Discovery Risks for 2013 –
tags: LitSupport MM
E-Discovery: Why You Should Go Native! | Legal Talk Network
tags: LitSupport MM
Are Corporations Getting It? A Corporate eDiscovery “Risk Check”
tags: LitSupport MM
Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.
Follow these topics: Links
This is an obvious use of AI in law, allowing clients the ability to respond to questions and get legal documents like a will without the much higher expense of a lawyer’s time. This, is the part that jumped out at me though: “Much of the work these bots, and AI technology in general, do…
As an industry, we’re always behind, but this is telling – “As new types of content materialize from various applications and devices, the e-discovery process will become more difficult. According to a recent report from Osterman Research, any electronic information is potentially subject to e-discovery, including text messages, social media posts, data in collaboration…
What they argue for instead is a decentralization of our work. That rather than being the center of our lives and our time, work is simply a transaction. We give you output, you pay us. That’s it. It’s all there is.
That’s the revolution they are looking for. It might seem like a simple change, but it’s actually quite a different way to look at the world of work. Go read more and listen to the episode. It’s interesting to consider.
Last week I was in London to attend a conference being put on by my employer, and to teach a training class in the days following the conference. With the conference allowing for a number of employees to be in town, I had a few newbies in my class as part of helping them understand…
See Jon, even when the investigation has nothing to do with you, those comments you made in the email exist, and the guy you sent them to didn’t, or couldn’t, delete them. So even though they may have flown under the radar for all these years, all it took was one investigation or lawsuit to involve the other people on the email chain, and everything you said is now out there.
You would think people would stop having to relearn this lesson every few years, but alas here we are.
There’s a lot in this to be mindful of when you’re participating in a meeting, or now days if you’re doing a video webinar or broadcast as well, but this one for me is lesson number 1: “Even if you don’t need to be fully engaged in the meeting, your professional reputation can suffer if…
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
See a sample before subscribing here
RT @mikemac29: This Week’s Links (weekly): Four considerations in selecting and implementing new legal holds technology tags: L… http://…