Trust
|

Tech Companies Simply Don’t Care About Fake News

Actually, what we’re seeing more and more is that tech companies are moving forward with amazing stuff, but not really thinking about the consequences of it being misused. Take, for example, this BBC segment about Adobe.

In it, the narrator points out that the new technology Adobe is coming up with could easily be used to create fake photos and videos, very convincing fakes at that, even more so than what we’ve already seen with Photoshop. Adobe’s response? They’re much more interested in what people can create with it.

Or, take a look at this little Twitter thread by Kumail Nannjani about the tech companies he gets to visit as part of their show, companies who are developing products with obvious ethical concerns, yet the companies aren’t even considering them. In fact, he describes them as being shocked at anyone even asking the questions.

That’s not good. We’ve seen what happens when you open up a social network and accept advertising from anyone, anywhere, and allow the advertisers to target the ads based on a whole lot of personal information with Facebook and Twitter. They built those tools and apparently had no idea that anyone would use them for political subversion, or to harass other users, even though that was a clear and obvious use for them. They were too busy building “cool stuff” to be bothered with thinking through how it would be misused, and how to safeguard against it, and now it appears that government officials are going to be the ones to tell them how to safeguard their tools.

Yes, the same government officials who clearly don’t understand encryption and why people want it, will be the ones who decide how best to safeguard technology. Excuse me if that doesn’t exactly fill me with confidence.

Simply put, it is clear that technology is on pace to outstrip our ability to spot fake photos/audio/video very, very soon. The entire legal system and it’s basis on hard evidence is going to be impacted, let alone the impact it will have on media credibility. When Adobe makes it super easy for creatives to completely edit out someone or something from a video, or relocate the entire city of Denver to be oceanfront with one click, how will we be able to believe anything we see and hear? Or will we go on believing it anyway, choosing instead to naively think that no one would take advantage of this technology?

The answer to that question will shape society over the next few years. Trust is an important concept in society and business. When we can no longer trust anything we see, where do we go from there?

 

Similar Posts

  • Quick Thought – The I Have Nothing To Hide Brigade

    It never actually fails, every time there’s an article or mention of new surveillance tools being used by law enforcement or some other security group, complaints about the privacy violation are met with the “I have nothing to hide” opposition. The inference here, of course, is that anyone desiring privacy has something to hide, and…

  • |

    Linked – Huge MIT Study of ‘Fake News’: Falsehoods Win on Twitter

    It’s true, fake news spreads farther, and faster, than the truth, but it’s not really Twitter’s fault: “And blame for this problem cannot be laid with our robotic brethren. From 2006 to 2016, Twitter bots amplified true stories as much as they amplified false ones, the study found. Fake news prospers, the authors write, “because…

  • Police Auctioned Mobile Devices – Complete with Illegal Data!

    Imagine, if you will an identity thief caught in the act by law enforcement. As part of the evidence collection, they find a mobile device with a whole bunch of stolen credit cards, driver’s licenses, and other data that was in the process of being used by said thief, to steal the identities of dozens of people.

    That evidence sits in the property room until such a time as the law says it’s safe for the law enforcement agency to get rid of it, at which time the device is put up for auction.

    You would think that before auctioning off these devices with illegally-gotten and dangerous information on them, the various agencies would have wiped them clean, no?

    According to the University of Maryland, you’d be completely wrong.

  • Links (weekly)

    lightning photography tips for beginners tags: photography MM Cooperation and Electronic Data Discovery tags: LitSupport MM E-Discovery Traffic Control – Merging on the Litigation Superhighway tags: LitSupport MM Are Settlements Responsible for eDiscovery Lip Service? tags: Litsupport MM D.C. Applies the Screws to E-Discovery Vendors tags: Litsupport MM Is eDiscovery just the ‘tip of the…

  • On-line brainstorming

    Saw an interesting post on Dumb Little Man today, about an on-line brainstorming tool called Bubbl.us. I think the next time we’re white-boarding stuff at work I might have to suggest using this tool so we can actually make a copy of it. Tags: Bubbl.us, Brainstorming Follow these topics: Tech

  • Firefox 3.0 RC2

    Circumstances pushed me to updating to the latest release candidate of Firefox 3.0. Namely, Firefox becoming completely unstable on my Macbook Pro. As I mentioned, I had started messing with 3.0 RC1 with a mobile version running off my thumb drive, trying to hold off updating any of my machines until it was an official…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)