Computer with Do More on the screen
|

Quick Thought – ISPs Are Now a Hurdle to Remote Working

As we’ve watched the business world conduct more transformation in these last two weeks than many have been able to muster up in years, there are a few things I find interesting.

I wrote earlier that I thought work from home would become a whole lot more popular, now that we are all going to figure out how to make it work for a large number of employees. For years the real drag on remote work has been management’s unwillingness to allow it. To not trust their employees to continue working and getting things done when they aren’t right there. This pandemic has forced them to set that aside and do it anyway, where a whole lot of people were going to run right smack into the other hurdle to wide-spread work from home, ISP bandwidth caps and overage charges.

To be honest, I had not really considered this until I saw the news about some ISPs and cellular companies waiving overage charges and caps for 30 days to help people forced to work from home. I’ve worked from home for years, and have never even considered getting service from an ISP that didn’t have unlimited bandwidth. Back when I was doing online classes, the company reimbursed me for business-level internet service, and even now I only considered full non-capped internet service.

Simply put, bandwidth caps and work from home are totally incompatible. The ISPs seemed to grasp that, and actively proactively to turn that off temporarily. which also showed that they could turn it off and continue to offer solid internet connections to all of their customers, but that’s an argument for another day.

No, they surely had to realize that now that businesses were going to be forced to get over their fear of work from home, it’s the ISP and broadband service that was about to be the one major hurdle to helping out during this pandemic.

But, once this is over? If we have a lot more companies and a lot more employees looking at work from home situations, to take advantage of the work-life and environmental benefits, how many are going to be halted by a lack of available unlimited internet access, or the expense involved in getting decent service to their house?

Who would have thought one of the biggest hurdles to remote work would actually be the ISPs we all deal with just to get on the internet to start with, but it is possible.

Similar Posts

  • |

    What was he thinking?

    So you’re a cable repair guy. you go to someone’s house and there’s obviously a network running. The cable modem is giving the customer problems, so you decide to try and replace it. In fact the tech support folks on the phone told the customer that there seems to be a recent history of the modem losing connection to…

  • | |

    SmartSetr

    Kevin Devin has a nice screencast over at Friends in Tech showing off a little tool he found from Eric Appel called SmartSetr that lets you create dynamic sets on Flickr by tag or date, etc. I’ll definitely be taking a look at that one soon. Another tool that I might take a look at…

  • |

    Linked: Some workers can’t afford to RTO

    As someone who has worked remotely since mid-2019, I have appreciated the number of ways my life is less expensive for a while.

    That was before the recent bout of inflation, though. How much more am I saving by driving infrequently, not paying for parking or public transit, not needing to buy new business clothes, and eating the food I have in my house for lunch every day?

    This was not insignificant in 2019 when I made the change. In 2022 that has to be much more than it was.

    So, when you’re contemplating your return to the office strategy, are you calculating the pay cut you’re forcing on all of your employees, and how many of them can’t actually afford that?

  • |

    Linked: You Don’t Need to Meet Every Qualification to Apply for a Job

    I see this often, in young people just starting out, and plenty of people who’ve been around a bit longer and should know better. They look at a job posting, and find the one thing that rules them out, instead of seeing the bigger picture. Practically speaking, it’s useful for almost everyone to treat job…

  • Trust is Easily Broken

    Consider the message this sends to employees. This decision was made at a level above the person who is left to explain it to you. No one from that level wants to explain it or answer your questions. That’s not a trustworthy organization. That’s a leader hiding from people being impacted by their decisions.

    That’s not a leader I’d want to work for. Some might even argue that they aren’t a leader at all.

    When you lose that trust, you’ll lose the retention battle.

  • |

    Linked: Addressing employee burnout: Are you solving the right problem?

    Kudos to McKinsey for the research, but really just for the first line of this paragraph:

    “As an employer, you can’t “yoga” your way out of these challenges. Employers who try to improve burnout without addressing toxic behavior are likely to fail. Our survey shows that improving all other organization factors assessed (without addressing toxic behavior) does not meaningfully improve reported levels of burnout symptoms. Yet, when toxic behavior levels are low, each additional intervention contributes to reducing negative outcomes and increasing positive ones.”

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)