Red Letters Spelling out Fake

Why The Lies Matter

According to this Psychology Today article, they matter because we are completely incapable of ignoring them. Even when we know something isn’t true, it still impacts our thought processes because our brains cannot unlearn information we take in.

The example from the article is a good place to start:

Now imagine this scenario: You are a loan officer at a bank reviewing a mortgage application of a recent college graduate with a stable, well-paying job and solid credit history. The applicant seems qualified, but during the routine credit check, you discover that the applicant has an unpaid debt on their credit card account. One report says that the debt is $5,000 and the other says $25,000. Do you reject or approve the application? Or, do you wait until you can resolve the discrepancy and get more information?

 

These are two scenarios used with business students to illustrate how irrelevant information influences decision-making.

 

Logically, people should respond to these same scenarios in the same way. In both situations, the applicant definitely has at least $5,000 in unpaid debt. However, in the first scenario, 60 percent of students reject the applicant and 40 percent approve. In the second scenario, only 4 percent reject, 8 percent approve, and 90 percent wait. Of those who wait, when they learn that the debt is $5,000, 80 percent approve the loan.

Think about this. In both scenarios, the applicant has at least $5,000 in unpaid debt, but when the possibility of a $25,000 debt is suggested—and found to be untrue—people are more lenient. Their evaluation of the $5,000 debt is altered by the completely false suggestion that there is a $25,000 debt.

When I read that scenario, what it reminds me of is what we see on social media. There are plenty of things that we see that we know aren’t true, or that we later learn aren’t true, but they are still impacting our decisions. When we see posts about a conspiracy theory enough, even if we know it isn’t true, the fact that we’re seeing it becomes information we are now including in how we feel about it. Sometimes it can kick off a fear response. (I keep hearing about how dangerous vaccines are, and sure, I know there are no studies that actually show that, but maybe I should be afraid?) Other times it kicks off a response like the one above. (I was expecting tens of millions of COVID-19 deaths in the US, and there have “only” been 200,000, which IS horrible, but maybe the risk is not so real, or I can ignore it?)

We like to convince ourselves that we are rational. That we look at the facts, as best as we can, and make rational choices. But, it’s not true. And, more importantly, people who want to influence us know this. Why do you think stores almost always show you a “sale price” on an item? They want to implant in your mind the “reality” that if you wait and come back tomorrow, you might have to pay the higher price. (Hint, tomorrow, it’ll still be the sale price. Two weeks from now, it might even be cheaper, there are no rules about how this works.) We know that probably isn’t true, and maybe we even know that this isn’t even what we came in the store to buy, and we don’t need it, but enough of us will buy it that the stores will keep right on doing it.

And yes, even Russian influencers know it too. They know that if they keep pushing fake stories about how awful things in the US are, and how much certain groups are dangerous, and hateful, the more they will tap into our fear responses. So, again, we may know that news items are made up, but see enough of them, shared enough times, and that information sticks around. It rattles around our brains and starts to play with our imagination, even though it’s not true, or relevant to the decision that needs to be made. They know that if they can spark an emotional response, that emotion will impact what we do next.

They’re counting on exactly that.

So what can we do about it? Camille’s suggestions in the link above are pretty good. Don’t react to emotionally charged information right away, give it time to settle in your brain so that you can come back to it more thoughtfully later, and stop to consider what information we are sharing, and how it impacts people. Is it true? Is it helpful? Is it useful? Or, is it just an emotional response that isn’t going to be useful or helpful to anyone?

We may not be able to stop our brains from taking in information, it’s literally what kept humans alive for centuries, but we can be more thoughtful about how that information impacts us emotionally, and how the information we put out in the world may be doing the same for others, and think twice about doing exactly that.

Remember, just about everything you read or see, is being put out by someone with an agenda. Before you let your emotions run wild, figure out what that agenda is, and whether it’s something you want to be on board with. And if their agenda is harmful to you, and your emotional state, there’s no reason to keep submitting yourself to it. There’s no rule that says you have to follow anyone on social media, or real life.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Happiness Lab On How Grades And Rewards are Manipulative

    One of the most popular arguments we hear, and one I’ve made myself, is that to truly stay informed, and avoid living in the bubble of our own political bias, we need to make sure we are getting information from a variety of sources, including ones we may not agree with.

    This study seems to be telling us that isn’t enough, and it can easily be manipulated. If I read an opposing viewpoint, and there’s no reward for doing so, I’m unlikely to really be influenced by it, but if I read an opposing viewpoint and get rewarded for it, I’m more likely to change my mind.

    Now, remember that emotional contagion we might get from social media? What if I shared one side of a political view, and got rewarded by the algorithms or whomever with lots of likes and comments, and the post got shared a whole bunch, but posts from the other side, got none of that? Which side am I more likely to agree with? Right, the one that I got better grades on. Not because it’s true, better, or more accurate, but because I am rewarded for thinking that way. Rewarded the way I’ve been my whole life, since I was a little boy, from the first time my parents wanted me to behave a certain way, all the way through my school years, and for all of my career.

    How hard would that be to fight against? Almost impossible, I’d say. How easy would it be for social media to do it, either the companies themselves, or large groups of users?

    How does that influence what we do see on social media?

  • More on Facebook Photos and Privacy

    So I noticed earlier this week that your profile photo was being sent out to anyone who had you as a contact on through the iPhone app, today F-Secure points out something about private photos that you might not have noticed, that anyone with access to them can share them! Still, complaints about privacy aside,…

  • Blogs are Back

    If you aren’t yet that dedicated to RSS feeds, this may be a super-easy way to get started. It’s free, you don’t even need an account, the data is stored in your browser, or you can create a free account and sync the data across your devices. 

  • |

    Bloggers, Is Your Twitter Handle Easy to Find?

    I retweeted a post from Kevin O’Keefe the other day, where he talks about the importance of a lawyer having a Twitter handle so they can get mentioned for writing an article, or being on a panel, etc. I think that applies to all bloggers and online authors as well: Lawyers Need To Be Using…

  • | |

    Texting Bans, and Measuring the Correct Things

    So, statistics show that, despite the increasing number of bans on cell phone use, or texting while driving, the number of traffic accidents hasn’t gone down. I’m not at all surprised. Now, mind you, it’s probably too early to really tell whether there will be any long-term drop as a result of these bans, and…

  • | | |

    Another Good Reason to do Social Networking

    On an E-Discovery webinar today, Browning Marean of DLA Piper was talking about the duty of attorneys to be competent to some degree with the technology they were dealing with, when he said the following: “One way to get competent is to associate yourself with people who are competent.” Now he was referring to vendors,…

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)