I’ve been doing a bunch of demo’s of Trial Director around the firm lately, and getting some pretty decent response from the folks who see it. The demo’s do prove a couple of things to me though, especially as compared to Summation demo’s I’ve done for these same people. 1. You can’t possibly know how…
I was working this afternoon on a demo I’m doing tomorrow to a group of attorney’s and paralegals. We had discussed a couple of months ago doing a sort of “show and tell” of ways we could try and make their lives easier by changing some of the workflow within our document review platform, Summation…
Many of you may already know this, and to some extent I’m marking this here for my own purposes, but you can download the Enron data set from the EDRM website and use it as sample data for testing purposes. Personally, I’m going to grab some of the data for testing, and for training. Never…
I forgot to mention this earlier, probably because the “official” announcement came out while I was on vacation sans laptop, but I am officially certified as a Trial Director 5 trainer. Now, since I can’t really do much training outside of my own firm, the certification doesn’t mean much. (It’d be a conflict of interest…
It’s been around for awhile now, but I never knew about it. This approach does work, but it’s clunky, and I would imagine, cumbersome to support. Still, one of the biggest complaints I get from users trying to use Remote Desktop to review documents in Summation is the fact that they have to limit themselves…
I had an interesting conversation with an attorney today, who is doing something rather interesting with our document review tool, Summation. He’s gotten so used to reviewing documents in it, and searching in it, and come to rely on the OCR search especially, that he’s pulled together a bunch of random emails, articles, white papers,…