I didn’t realize they were doing that..

I was paying my cable bill just now and I noticed that the insert this month was for something called Time Warner Cable Home Networking, where Time Warner will install a wireless network for you, all for the low price of $14.95 per month, plus possible equipment and installation fees. When I took a look at the online info I couldn’t help but notice that they seem to be big on the “no expensive equipment to buy” benefit. Given that you can get a Linksys wireless router and second network card for, what $100?, and since you already have one network card for the cable modem anyway, buying your own equipment for a second computer as opposed to spending $14.95 per month would actually pay for itself in a little more than 6 months, wouldn’t it? I don’t see the benefit there, even if you have to pay out a little bit to an “expert” to come install it for you, it’d pay for itself fairly quickly.

But, on the other hand, what if T/W decides that if you want to use a wireless network to share your cable connection you have to pay for their wireless networking? That would piss a lot of people off, wouldn’t it? They wouldn’t be that stupid, would they? Could they afford to be that stupid? They could if they’re the only broadband ISP around. Or am I just being paranoid?

Something to watch for in 2003.

Similar Posts

  • Goodbye old friend

    It appears that VMyths is going to cease operations while Rob Rosenberger is on an extended tour in the Persian Gulf. I’ll miss it. Not only did I enjoy Rob’s presentation at Gnomedex last year, but I used the site on a pretty conisistent basis as a reference tool, and pointer when dealing with questions…

  • How to aggravate hundreds in one easy step:

    It’s easy, just take any three day weeekend, like this one, and leave an “out of office” auto-reply on your account, and please, oh please, misconfigure it so that it replies to every message on a mailing list. (Including it’s own messages of course, so that you just run a continous loop!) Nice job! I…

  • Some ideas..

    William left a comment to the effect that the version of Red Hat I was trying to install uses LILO and that might be the thing that’s interfering with the NT-based install. (That’s why it worked flawlessly with 98 and not on this new server.) Getting a later version that uses a different boot loader…

  • Problems, problems

    What’s going on today, all of our connections to the internet have been rather flaky, both through the cable modem and dial-up with a different ISP? Some sites I can’t get to at all, others are SLOW, and others I can access some parts one time, other parts another time. Maybe the strong winds outside…

  • Why?

    If you worked in sales for a relatively large, classroom computer-training company, and you had to make sales calls to IT people would you make any of those calls before 9AM? It’s not like I want to hear from you ever, let alone when I’m still working on my first cup of coffee! Follow these…

  • Interesting

    Jeff makes an interesting point regarding writing a weblog anonymously or not. It’s something I’ve been struggling with as the new year approaches and I look at the prospect of a job search. Is the fact that you can easily find my weblog by searching by my name a good thing or not a good…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)