The famous 10%

I was reading through blogs today when I found this post by Ian about Photoshop and the fact that folks use 10 percent of the features. One of Ian’s comments struck an interesting cord with me:

He may only use 10% but perhaps I use a different 10%.

It got me thinking about the where I first heard the famous line “users only use 10% of the features”, it was in regards to Word. At my old, small-office job I always believed that was true. I was sure we only ever used 10% of the features at the most. When I moved over to a larger office, I thought maybe users would be using closer to 20 or 25%. That thought continued to be in my mind as I struggled trying to master the features that folks in a law firm use that I hadn’t spent much time supporting in my old job. Stuff like section breaks, footnotes, tables of contents, etc. We simply didn’t work with documents that long and detailed in a small office the same way. On the other hand, over time I’ve noticed that there are things I used to support a lot, that folks here hardly ever do, like mail merges, mailing labels, name tag merges, etc. So in reality, while each of these sets of users are doing pretty different things, and only using a small fraction of the available features, there different features.

So maybe the fact that users only use 10% of the available features isn’t much of a critique of any piece of technology, because different groups are going to be using a different 10%. Word, for example, needs to fit for all of those different groups with all their different needs, so it has a ton of features. If it didn’t, it’d be destined to be only a niche product.

Tags: TenPercent, Features

Similar Posts

  • Reading over lunch

    Getting a small chance to play catch up while I eat lunch, since Angela went home sick. (The heat in the building has reached a point of making her nauseous, maybe it’s time to send everyone home!) Phil’s got a list of ways to surf blogs at random: NextBlog! gives you a random recently updated…

  • Pulling my hair out

    I spent just about all of my work day troubleshooting issues with a new PC I just setup last week and it’s driving me crazy! This is a new OEM of Windows XP Pro, updated to SP2, running Office 2000. There were two issues, both of which involved spooling processes and timeouts. One was sending…

  • Switch over

    I officially switched the RSS Feed over to the new BloggerPro version of it, since it came out of Beta and into production. Now if you click the little “XML” image on the right side, you’ll go to that feed instead of the old one. The old one will continue to work for now, but…

  • Since it came up..

    Only because some one asked, let me reiterate that if you look way down there on the bottom left-hand side of the page, you’ll see a link to the Creative Commons. If you follow the link, you can get a look at the simple “licensing” structure I have in place for this blog and what…

  • Bummer

    OK I found a sort of bummer thing about my idea to play around with Knoppix. While I can access all the files on my C drive even when I’m booted into Knoppix instead of Windows, I can’t edit any of my MS Office files in OpenOffice. They open as read-only, and when I try…

One Comment

  1. Yep, I think you’ve got it. Not that I want to be the poster child for bloatware, but when you’re a market leading product like Word or Photoshop you need to have alot of features for all the different groups you serve. Of course there’s room for niche players too, but do you really want to support Word, Wordperfect and StarOffice? No. So your company picks the one that “everyone” uses that has features for just about everything and runs with it.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)