When do work-arounds hurt you?

That last post brings to mind an interesting idea in my mind. One that I’d like to get other’s input on because although I’ve only been at my job for a year or so, I’m beginning to understand that the common view of the IT Department had been in the past that we don’t always know what we’re doing, and that sometimes we created workarounds because we didn’t actually know how to fix a problem or were too lazy to figure it out.

I hope that I don’t leave people with that impression in my personal dealings with them. I certainly try to find any possible solution to a problem before I give in and simply create a work-round, unless I’m pressed for time. Even then, however, I think it’s important to enable the user to use the workaround but continue to find a permanent solution.

Sometimes, however, you simply can’t provide a permanent solution. Sometimes the software just isn’t designed to do what they want to do. Sometimes there’s a bug in third-party software that they haven’t fixed and you can’t do anything about.

The question is, at what point do your users cross over that line between seeing you as the master of finding work-arounds, to the guy who’s too lazy or incompetent to find real solutions?

tags: TechSupport

Similar Posts

  • Tuesday stuff

    After wasting an evening at Nationwide Arena watching the Blue Jackets lose 8-0 to Boston, (ouch!) I’m back on top of the latest tech stuff this morning. Browser tool protects and educates Web surfers -This seems like it might not be a bad thing to check out. They have a 20 day free trial, you…

  • Still clueless after all these years

    Quote from this article about the broadband market: “We’re still finding that most broadband customers are attracted by speed and other practical benefits,” he said. “It’s not viewed as a content-driven medium yet.” I have broadband so I can upload pictures, download freeware and share stuff quicker. Buying content isn’t even on my radar, how…

  • Clean up on aisle 5!

    I got home from my parents house last night, talked to Angela on the phone for a little while, read my email, wrote a few more, grabbed a new webcam pic, went to upload it to the site, and discovered something interesting. “Hmm, why do I have a default.htm, and an index.html in my main…

  • What’s going on

    I’ve been quiet this week about work on the intranet site, because I haven’t been working on it, really. I got it to a nice, stable place last week, and this week I’ve been writing documentation, trying to get a good written overview of what the site is about, what each module does, how to…

One Comment

  1. Short answer: if you have given your best effort and an “honest workaround” is the alternative, then that’s what they get.

    If you look at it from the client perspective, they have a priority list: is it working, doing what I want it to do, in a timely manner, in a way that’s easy to use. Our workarounds typically deal with the latter priorities, while we seem to hustle more when it’s the first two priorities.

    We will always have clients that want one-button-to-press answers (Staples-easy?) and have it work every time. These are the same people that think an anti-virus program should clean a computer 100% and that they are safe when they install a nanny-net minder for the kid’s computer.

    All of this change we face daily and the need to keep up does have a benefit: job security! [Until a troglodyte manager experiences a major computer glitch and thinks it’s your fault.]

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)