| |

How do you Cover for Specialists?

Some of you who follow me on Twitter may have seen that I worked late a couple of days last week as some sort of epidemic has swept the help desk area of our firm, leaving them quite short-handed. In fact, they were left with no one available between the regular folks who work there, and the couple of usual backups to cover the phones until 6PM each evening, which is the customary procedure. Not having any immediate plans after work, I stepped in and covered them.

While I was down there, another one of our IS folks and I were discussing how much tech support has changed. Time was when he, and everyone in the IT department where he worked, had the help desk line on their phones and we expected to answer it when the regular folks were tied up, but that was when all you had to support was PC hardware and maybe MS Office apps. Now, there are dozens of apps in use, in a variety of specialties, that he doesn’t even know how to use, much less support.

As we talked, I realized how much that is true. The folks who were brought in as specialists, like for Networking, Telecommunications, and DBA, simply don’t have the knowledge to do general end-user support. Our firm is a little luckier than most, because some of the other IT specialist positions are folks who started out working at the help desk, like myself, and can step in. On the other hand, it’s only been a bit more than 2 years since I worked there fulltime, and there have been some applications added that I don’t use, and couldn’t possibly support. (Luckily no one called with a question about those while I was flying solo down there!) The others who’ve been away for even longer, have even more apps where that is the case.

We came to realize, not just that we really only had a limited number of people who could effectively backup the help desk folks, but that we had very limited backup for any of our positions. When our telecommunications guy is on vacation, there is an official “backup” person, but what can be handled in his absence is very limited. A major telephone system meltdown during his vacation is going to result in a serious problem. Now with our Litigation Support Department consisting of me, and one other person working remotely 4 days a week, on that 5th day, if I get sick, and there’s someone needing trial prep work done, there’s no one to do it. Same goes for our one web developer. If something needs done, and she’s not there to do it, what happens?

As more and more firms try to “do more with less” in this economy, how many IT people are having to be “on call” even when they’re on vacation, or over weekends, or when they’re sick, because they’re the only one’s who can handle some tasks? What does your organization do to try and prevent this, or do you simply require them to live with this expectation? Are your IT people expected to always be reachable? Are they therefore limited in where they can go on vacation, because of this expectation that they will always be able to log in remotely and work on something at a moment’s notice? Is that really fair?

Personally, I don’t think it is. More importantly, if there’s only one person at your firm who can fix certain issues, what do you do when that person gets hit by a bus? Or leaves? Aren’t you asking for trouble if you simply ignore the fact that skills and knowledge haven’t been shared among the whole team and you’ve simply laid these expectations at the feet of your folks as your “solution”?

So as technology gets more specialized, and budgets get tighter, what do you do to have a backup plan?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Similar Posts

  • |

    Linked – Leaked NSA Hacking Tool On Global Ransomware Rampage

    This. Just this. There are no “safe” backdoors. “Once again, this reinforces why we should not allow backdoors to encryption or any other such vulnerability. Over and over again, the proponents of backdooring encryption have insisted that it can be built in a “safe” way, where only government will get the backdoor access to encryption….

  • |

    ILTA 08 links for Tuesday

    Looks like things are picking up on the blogs and Twitter today. Glad to see it, but it can still be better! Collaboration Tools and Technologies for Lawyers (at ILTA) Knowledge Management ILTA talk on Social Networking — Boon or Boondoggle; Tuesday afternoon ILTA online discussion : What a difference two years makes ILTA KM…

  • Question about Google Reader

    Actually, it’s a question about the shared items RSS feed. I subscribed to Scoble’s Shared items in Bloglines the other day and discovered something odd. Instead of the title of each post showing as the title, the title of the original blog shows as the post title. That makes scanning the feed a lot harder…

  • Would you Pay to use Twitter?

    Tim leaves out of his analysis accounting for how many users will no longer be there and how that much smaller user base impacts the value proposition. If I’m a journalist using Twitter to interact with readers and attract new readers to my publication, the ROI of paying for a fully-featured Twitter account includes considering how many people it helps me reach. Is it still worth it when my 250,000 followers get cut to 25,000? What about 2,500? What about less?

    Before you dismiss that as unlikely, I’d like you to remember that recent Pew research found that “the top 25% of users by tweet volume produce 97% of all tweets, while the bottom 75% of users produce just 3%, according to an analysis conducted over a three-month period in 2021.”

    I’m going to just assume that the 75% group who isn’t tweeting very often is not going to pay for Twitter. Of the other 25% we have to consider how many of them will fall into the $12 per year plan because they already don’t follow many people but use Twitter to interact with people who want to follow them. The question is, will those followers still exist? And if they don’t exist, is Twitter still a global conversation? Or is it just another place for privileged people who pay for membership to talk to each other?

2 Comments

  1. I (Applications Support Specialist) work in IT for a law firm. I’m the first person to answer help desk phones. If I’m not available, then the Desktop Support Specialist guy answers them. If we’re both unavailable, then the Network Administrator answers them. If we’re all busy, then it falls to the Litigation Support Specialist. Basically, we’re all “specialists”, yet we all answer help desk calls. We only have 60 lawyers, so our IT staff is small. I hate being called “help desk”, because it often implies that I don’t know very much and can only answer basic calls and need a script to do so. Of course, we all know that is very different in a law firm.

  2. Tina,

    It sounds like, in your smaller environment there's no need for a specific person who solely works in tech support/helpdesk role, however it also sounds like you've got a bunch of specialists who can all cover the help desk questions, but maybe not do each others jobs. For example, if your network admin is gone for some reason, who can handle network and server problems? Who would handle a corrupt app install build if you weren't there, etc.? That's just as much of a problem in my mind.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)