AT&T Goes Against Net Neutrality

With the announcement today of AT&T’s sponsored data program, we’ve seen the end of net neutrality when it comes to their wireless customers. Sure, the content providers are going to be the ones footing the bill, so consumers probably won’t care, at least until they can’t do much of anything but see the content that providers paid to be carried over the network.

Maybe it’ll never come to that, but as a content provider myself, one who is never going to able pay to make sure my websites are being provided to you without hitting your data caps, I worry about the small guys. I worry that small internet sites without the resources of ESPN or Yahoo! will become the cable access channels of the internet. Out there plugging away, with no hope of any one ever finding us.

Or maybe I’m overreacting. What do you think, where do you see this idea of sponsored content winding up in the next 5 years?

 

 

 

Similar Posts

  • Light Bulb Moments

    Today was a very good day. I had two training sessions scheduled, back to back, covering two very different topics. One was supposed to be a class, but turned into one attendee, on working with transcripts in Summation. The second one was a scheduled one-on-one training session on using an RSS reader. In both sessions…

  • |

    Why iOS Devices are Popular

    I’ve probably seen that Samsung commercial a dozen times over the last few days. The one that makes a pretty good mockery of people waiting in line for the iPhone 5. The one that makes a really good point about all the things that still, STILL, aren’t available for iPhone users, that we could have…

  • New Resource for E-Discovery Info

    Thanks to The Complex Litigator for pointing me to this new site, ElectronicDiscovery.info. Not only is there a blog at this site, there’s an e-discovery news feed pulling information from all over the internet (I located a link to my last post in the feed, that always helps me view the site positively..*L*), and a…

  • Linked – Why public chats are better than direct messages

    But, here it the real world, this doesn’t always work out very well. You really need the culture to be one where everyone is used to working asynchronously and checking the public channel for chances to help out the team. It sounds like that is both the expectation and the reality at this company but for a lot of us the reality is very different. Posting something in a public channel where no one gets a notification that a message is being posted generally means no one sees it. So we go back to using private channels or tagging people in the public channel in order so that we purposefully interrupt them. We haven’t developed a culture where asynchronous communication works and I suspect it’s because we don’t really want it. We want people to respond to us now. We don’t trust them to get back later and, to be fair, we don’t give our peers reason to trust us because we spend all of our time putting out fires and frequently forget to get back to people.

    In many cases, it’s a humblebrag. “Oh I saw your message but then I got involved in important things because I’m an important person and never got back to you”.

  • Bad Service Will Cost You

    My good friend, Kevin Donahue, who works in the hotel sales industry, posted a story today that talked about how much bad service costs a hotel versus all the other things guest might complain about. But there is one problem – over and above all others – that causes not only dissatisfaction, but a complete…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)