|

Linked – Apparent Redaction Failure Leads To Government Confirming Target Of Lavabit Investigation

redacted photo
Image by andymangold

Silly government workers. Go to all that trouble to try and hide the identity of the person under investigation but forget to redact the email address associated with that person, which happens to have his name in it?

See, this is why you have to consider any and all personally identifiable information when you’re looking for things that need to be redacted, including variations of email addresses. This is a silly mistake by the government, but one that probably gets repeated in less public cases on a regular basis. Stop and think about all the information that could be used to identify someone before you make the data public.

Apparent Redaction Failure Leads To Government Confirming Target Of Lavabit Investigation

Similar Posts

  • |

    Follow The Leader

    Last year it was AccessData acquiring Summation, and now that they are releasing their new version of Summation Pro, fully integrated with the FTK backend that takes you from forensic acquisition straight through to attorney review,  I guess this should come as no shock. Guidance Software to Acquire CaseCentral Actually, this is good news as…

  • |

    Linked: The UK’s Mental Health Issues in the Workplace – 5 statistics

    The other statistics in this article point out what kind of impact those two facts above have on the bottom line, but I’m going to take issue with the importance they are given in this article. Don’t just make changes in your workplace culture because it’s better for the bottom line, do it because it’s the right thing to do for the human beings who work for you. They aren’t lines on a spreadsheet, they are people, with lives outside of work, who you have an opportunity to support. The fact that supporting them might also help your bottom line is nice, but irrelevant to the larger issue.

  • | |

    Linked: Is Your Midsize Company Designed for a Post-Pandemic Future?

    The reason that I say this is because not a day goes by that I don’t hear someone talking about “getting back” to onsite visits with clients, and doing training, or even CLEs in person again, without taking a moment to consider whether that is even feasible for the client.

    For example, on the training side, yes many folks miss the in-person workshops or training classes that a software or legal tech company would provide, but how many of us in that space have considered how difficult/expensive it might be for the client to gather their people into one location for that time?

  • The E-Discovery Headache

    I saw this article on-line today, Top Ten Reasons e-Discovery is a Major Headache for Most Companies and Lawyers. I couldn’t agree more. In fact, the more I learn about my new job, and the whole areas of electronic discovery and litigation support the more overwhelming it seems. Seriously, if your company was party to…

  • |

    Linked: Women in the Workplace

    This is an acute problem for many of us, who want to participate in doing the work of promoting diversity and inclusion but are still getting measured by everything other than that. And, as the survey points out, it is oftentimes women who take on this work, in an effort to help other women and minorities achieve.

    But, as much as the C-Level folks talk about the importance of this work, it is not a part of the job performance, nor is time and effort really allocated for it.

    How many of you volunteer to take on this work, running an employee resource group, putting together presentations, leading group discussions, often at the behest of top management, and then when it comes times for performance reviews, the only thing that matters is time spent on bringing in revenue?

    The message seems to really be, “It’s great that you want to do this work for us, but make sure you do it on your time because your productivity will be measured against the people who don’t spend any time at all doing this work”

  • | |

    Linked – Why Twitter Killed the Twitter Share Button

    “I don’t think Twitter can convince bloggers to pay for sharing data directly. But what if Twitter announces – and I’m telling you right now to expect this – that sharing counts are only available on the Twitter Analytics dashboard? In truth, the data available there is already pretty sweet, and if Twitter put sharing…

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)