Twitter
|

Twitter’s Pretty Much Tossing the Baby with the Bathwater at This Point

As many of you probably know, Twitter is fighting a losing battle with fake news, trolls, etc. They’ve tried a lot of really stupid things to try and, well, to try and make people be something that we aren’t, but that’s another post.

Recently, they’ve started putting some serious limits on accounts, limits that are making the service, and making third party services, a whole lot less useful for reaching an audience. Case in point, Buffer has now, per Twitter rules, made it impossible to post anything to Twitter more than once.

You are no longer able to Re-Buffer previously published Twitter posts to Twitter accounts. They can still be Re-Buffered to other social networks.

You are no longer able to schedule posts for Twitter multiple times using the  Power Scheduler feature.

As a blogger, here’s the problem with all of this. I don’t want to have to go to each and every social media account to share a new post, or to do it a handful of times so that more people than those who happen to be on Twitter when it posts, see it on Twitter.

Before all of these changes, my WordPress install automatically posted a new post (That I very likely scheduled to be posted instead of sitting there writing it live) to a number of social media accounts. Twitter, Facebook Pages, Google Plus and so on. I also had an IFTTT recipe to grab that post and tweet it again later, and another automated action to post it again 90 days from now. I might even log into Buffer occasionally at some odd hour and manually repost it to reach an overseas audience.

Now? I can still post it automatically from WordPress, but I suspect eventually that Twitter will remove that ability too.

For any other posts? I’m going to have to create some way to make those tweets different enough that Twitter won’t refuse them, and Buffer will actually also see them as “new” tweets.

I also can’t talk about workplace stress and depression here, and have that post to the twitter account tied to my Child Abuse page. I have to manually, again, go retweet it from there.

In a nutshell, rather than embrace the rich, diverse infrastructure that allows ideas to spread, Twitter seems to be purposefully creating a dumber version of itself. In this version, the only people you’ll be able to interact with, are the ones who happen to be looking at Twitter at the same time you are. That’s what it looked like when it first started, before all these other developers made good use of the APIs and built it up further.

It might be less controversial, but it’ll also be a whole lot less useful.

Similar Posts

  • Are we still discussing this?

    I see the full-feed/partial-feed debate has risen it’s ugly head again. Oh joy, just when I thought I might have missed something while I was toiling in the land of dialup at my in-laws all weekend, and then driving home today. Nope, same old crap. People with advertising, who are worried about the money they…

  • |

    Happiness Lab On How Grades And Rewards are Manipulative

    One of the most popular arguments we hear, and one I’ve made myself, is that to truly stay informed, and avoid living in the bubble of our own political bias, we need to make sure we are getting information from a variety of sources, including ones we may not agree with.

    This study seems to be telling us that isn’t enough, and it can easily be manipulated. If I read an opposing viewpoint, and there’s no reward for doing so, I’m unlikely to really be influenced by it, but if I read an opposing viewpoint and get rewarded for it, I’m more likely to change my mind.

    Now, remember that emotional contagion we might get from social media? What if I shared one side of a political view, and got rewarded by the algorithms or whomever with lots of likes and comments, and the post got shared a whole bunch, but posts from the other side, got none of that? Which side am I more likely to agree with? Right, the one that I got better grades on. Not because it’s true, better, or more accurate, but because I am rewarded for thinking that way. Rewarded the way I’ve been my whole life, since I was a little boy, from the first time my parents wanted me to behave a certain way, all the way through my school years, and for all of my career.

    How hard would that be to fight against? Almost impossible, I’d say. How easy would it be for social media to do it, either the companies themselves, or large groups of users?

    How does that influence what we do see on social media?

  • |

    No More Flickr or Facebook Question?

    We’ll have to wait on the details, but will the recent announcement that Yahoo! and Facebook are going to be tying their services together actually mean that us amateur photographers can stop trying to decide whether to share our photos on Flickr, or Facebook, and be able to tie the two groups of contacts together…

  • |

    Linked: Hackers are exploiting a critical flaw affecting >350,000 WordPress sites

    If you use this plugin, or really any plugin, keep ’em up to date! “Hackers are actively exploiting a vulnerability that allows them to execute commands and malicious scripts on Websites running File Manager, a WordPress plugin with more than 700,000 active installations, researchers said on Tuesday. Word of the attacks came a few hours…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)