Video Call
| |

Linked: Male Leaders Are the Leading Cause of Burnout for Working Women, Study Finds

The Tech industry clearly still has some work to do:

“There’s no better place to start than by looking at the pandemic’s effects on women in the tech industry, which is well-known for setting extremely difficult barriers for young women to build careers. To ensure there’s more than just anecdotal evidence of the new challenges facing women and underrepresented groups, Girls in Tech conducted a formal study: The Tech Workplace for Women in the Pandemic. And the results are just as gut-wrenching as every working woman would expect. “

Some of the findings definitely point to an industry that probably talks a lot about diversity, and eliminating bias, but the women in the field aren’t seeing it:

For example:

  • When the top executive at the company is male, 85% of women reported burnout.
  • 79% of working women with kids at home reported burnout
  • Even with so many of us working from home 27% reported being sexually harassed.
  • 41% have witnessed racial inequity in their workplace.

Nothing about those numbers sounds like a diverse, welcoming, workplace for women, and minority groups. Leaders, you need to be better than this.

How do you think your industry would fair in a survey like this?

Male Leaders Are the Leading Cause of Burnout for Working Women, Study Finds

Similar Posts

  • |

    Is the Internet Broken, or are We Broken?

    I read this recent quote from an article about Ev Williams this week and something seemed oddly familiar about it: The trouble with the internet, Mr. Williams says, is that it rewards extremes. Say you’re driving down the road and see a car crash. Of course you look. Everyone looks. The internet interprets behavior like…

  • |

    You Are More Than Your Job

    I think this is something that many of us have been realizing to some degree in the past couple of years. We are more than our work, and there are things in life that are more important than our work. I enjoyed the questions and challenges Arthur lays out as well, so you should go read the article and consider those. As I read through them I had one thought, over and over again.

    How many of my friends don’t even care about what I do for a living?

    I feel very lucky to have those folks. The people who’ve remained friends regardless of my current career status, The ones who might not even really understand what I do for a living. Because they ground me, and remind me that in actuality, what I do during my workday isn’t really that big of a deal. It’s all well and good to be great at my job, but the important people in my life are there because of the relationship we have, not because I’m good at legal tech, and I want them in my life because of who they are, not what their job is. 

    That’s a big deal.

  • |

    Linked – The Case Against Retweets

    I don’t think I’d go to the trouble of not seeing any retweets, but this does remind us that maybe don’t tweet or retweet something that makes you angry, it’s not really helping anything? “But what if viral content isn’t the best content? Two Wharton professors have found that anger tops the list of shareable…

  • How Anonymous is Anonymous Data?

    Turns out, it probably isn’t too difficult to put together some pieces of your identity using the “anonymous” data that is tracked by various companies. Lots of interesting things in this post by Chris Dale about various sources of data and how they will start to show up in the legal world as eDiscovery, but a…

  • |

    Linked: There’s Power in a Little Thank You

    Really enjoyed this article from Attorney at Work, because stories like this one just go to show how important it is to acknowledge the people who work for, and with, you: Consider the late Bob Bergland, a former U.S. secretary of agriculture and member of Congress who later worked as the general manager of an…

  • Linked – US Airports Scanning Americans’ Faces

    The DHS is expanding the program based on a 2004 biometric tracking law that was aimed at foreigners. Assessing privacy concerns, the agency said the “only way for an individual to ensure he or she is not subject to collection of biometric information when traveling internationally is to refrain from traveling.” Can we fast forward…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)