Linked – US Airports Scanning Americans’ Faces

The DHS is expanding the program based on a 2004 biometric tracking law that was aimed at foreigners. Assessing privacy concerns, the agency said the “only way for an individual to ensure he or she is not subject to collection of biometric information when traveling internationally is to refrain from traveling.”

Can we fast forward a few years and simply replace the word “traveling” with “going out of their home”? I think it’s entirely possible given the amount of mass surveillance that is already in place. Just overlay some facial recognition tools, hook it up to the passport/driver’s license databases, and we’re there!

Before you know it, people who value their privacy will simply stay home, and also disconnect from the internet. Won’t that make for a lovely little society?

http://blogs.findlaw.com/technologist/2017/07/us-airports-scanning-americans-faces.html

Similar Posts

  • Must have coffee…

    Yeah, I know, I made a typing error and breakfast in bed turned into breakfast in BAD. I wasn’t trying to insinuate that there was anything but breakfast, I just have this typing/spelling problem. Usually I rely on a good spell check, but, obviously, bad didn’t turn up as a bad spelling so I missed…

  • | |

    Linked: New Data Suggest Pandemic May Not Just Be Leaving Low-Income Students Behind; It May Be Propelling Wealthier Ones Even Further Ahead

    I think we sort of knew this was happening, but seeing all of the stats in the article below is alarming. There is, however an example of what it takes to keep kids engaged and learning even when they can’t go to school: “Jefferson Parish Schools used a number of interventions to keep students engaged…

  • Shared Links (weekly) Dec. 6, 2020

    Your Password Isn’t as Strong as You Think It Is – And Other Lessons in Cyber Safety

    Tips for Strong Passwords

    Exterro Acquires AccessData In Nine-Figure Deal, Expanding Its Platform And Setting Stage For Possible IPO

    Data Retention – More than Meets the Eye

    Why ransomware is still so successful: Over a quarter of victims pay the ransom

    Microsoft Scales Back the Privacy-Invading Productivity Score

    As the Pandemic Continues, Lawyer and IT Jobs May Still Be Fine. Support Staff? Maybe Not

    What types of information do law firms collect that may be subject to the GDPR?

    New PC or Mac? How to wipe your old Windows PC clean before getting rid of it

    Microsoft May Soon Score How Bored You Are in Meetings

  • |

    Lying Liars and the Lies We Spread – A Roundup

    I’ve been hanging on to a couple of articles recently that talk about some of the misinformation that gets spread online. Specifically, not just that the information is false, but that we don’t really seem to care. For example, did you know that the Washington Posts “What Was Fake on the Internet This Week” column…

  • |

    Linked: Does your remote team really need an in-person offsite?

    As the future of work settles in a bit, in the sense that we are now working remotely by choice more than by COVID requirement, we are seeing a large shift toward the desire to work remotely. I believe that shift is everyone listed above. For introverts, people with disabilities, people with adult or child care requirements, working remotely is bliss. (I did it even before COVID.) We can still do the other things that are important in our lives without being forced to a specific location, and we can do it without being forced to be in the same physical space as people we may or may not like.

    The problem is, and we see this clearly in the discussion below, doing things in-person is how we’ve always done things. The custom of having a quarterly or annual offsite was designed in a workplace that has always catered to extroverts and people who were available to be at the office for longer and longer hours. That culture has always excluded people. Think about the after-work drinks custom. How many moms got to attend instead of hurrying home to their kids, and how many men got to attend simply because somewhere there was a mom hurrying home to take care of the kids instead of them? How many introverted employees never showed up, or showed up out of a sense of guilt, quietly sipped their drink, and left as soon as it seemed polite to do so? And don’t even get me started on the number of employees in recovery who cannot, and should not, go out drinking with the group. 

    But, what did you hear about these events? They were great, we had a blast, we really got to bond with other folks from the team, etc. That feedback all comes from the minority that actually gets to go, and enjoys being in a group setting.

  • |

    Linked: Cyber attacks cost the world $45 bn in 2018; ransomware hit govts hard

    The numbers in this article are overwhelming to me. There are so many hacks, losses to phishing and ransomware, data breaches, etc. that it boggles the mind the consider. On the other hand, the report also points out that these numbers are so large, mostly due to a lack of solid cybersecurity practices. Wilbur said…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)