Morning News:

Looking at a rather busy day today, I have to run out of the office to testify at a hearing later, so that takes a big chunk out of my work day. (No I really can’t discuss the hearing other than to say that I am just a witness, it’s not a hearing that directly involves me *smile*) In the news this morning:

The Geek is playing with the new trial version of Dreamweaver, MX.. I’m interested in seeing how they’ve improved on DW and Fireworks in the new version, but in all honesty, I probably can’t afford to buy it! It’s expensive software, but I’m still curious!

Today’s Lockergnome Newsletters have some good information, well worth sharing. First in Windows Daily was a good reminder about giving out personal information, like credit card #’s, over a cordless or cell phone, and how easy it is for others to pick up that signal. Think land line and corded phone for those sorts of things folks! Also in today’s Tech Specialist, Randy shares a warning that Microsoft’s Security Baseline Analyzer actually has a bug in it that creates a brand new security hole. I’m glad MS is cracking down and closing holes but can’t they at least close holes without making new ones? Good grief!

Jevon has himself a nice little rant and mentions me, which is always good. *L* I have to agree with him though, I post stuff about MS security holes because, they’re in the news and easy to find, and because I run a Windows network at work and at home and need to keep up on it. (And most of my visitors run some version of Windows!) I don’t need to keep up with Linux, so Linux exploits I blog about tend to be few and far between. I don’t believe that Linux is any more the perfect secure OS than Windows is, it’s just more “politically correct” (in certain circles) to bash MS security, while saying nothing about the multiple security exploits that exist in other OS’s. It’s not as much fun to bash an underdog OS, even if there really are vulnerabilities that exist, as it is to bash Windows XP. I understand that, but don’t let it confuse you into thinking that just using another OS would solve all of your security worries. It won’t. The 100% secure OS hasn’t been made yet, and probably never will.

Similar Posts

  • Service

    Yesterday, between running around to meetings (I was out of the office attending meetings regarding other, personal, interests, bet you didn’t even notice?) I loaded up Trillian and ran into an error connecting to ICQ. Last night I did it again. I made a note to check the Trillian user forums and see if this…

  • New project

    Started working on my newest big project today. It’s not very exciting, but it’ll be a worry off my mind when it’s done. Now that I have a cd-burner on my work PC, I’m making backup copies of all of our software installation cd’s. I’ve been running on one copy of Office 2000 for two…

  • Out of the Office

    It was nice being away from the office for most of today. The Microsoft seminar was semi-interesting. Some demo’s of new software, which was interesting, but nothing that made me want to run out and buy any of them right this minute. There’s some things in Office XP that are nice, but nothing that would…

  • 20 Year Archive now Available on Google Groups

    20 Year Archive now Available on Google Groups This is actually fairly interesting. It’s got a listing of some of the more historic posts, like the first mention of Microsoft, or the first mention of AOL in Usenet. (Via Firda’s weblog .) This also presents us with a dilemna. For the last 20 years, how…

  • Why?

    I have a question, when you’re switching from using Outlook Express 6 to Outlook 2000, why does Outlook refuse to import message rules that are incompatible with older versions of Outlook? At least I think that’s what happened, when I imported the message rules, all of the “mail from specified account” rules didn’t import, and…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)