|

Computer Forensics

Our firm has, apparently, decided that the two of us who are now involved in litigation support should also be certified in computer forensics, so that we can do that for our clients, and be able to defend our practices in court, without having to go to the expense of hiring a forensics expert from the outside. It’s an interesting idea, in theory. We’ll see how it works out in practice.

The question we have been tasked with right now, though, is finding the most credible and valuable certification to pursue, and to find the best forensic tool we should be working with.

So, since I know some of my readers either have these sorts of certifications, use these tools, or know someone who does, I figured I’d throw open the comments to your suggestions. Let’s have it!

Luckily for me, the manager of our Litigation Support group will be pursuing the certification first. I’m going to be a little preoccupied pursuing the Summation Certified Trainer and Trial Director certifications this year, perhaps the forensics will come into play in early 2008. Either way, it’s going to keep me pretty busy.

Tags: ComputerForensics, LitigationSupport, SummationCertifiedTrainer

Similar Posts

  • |

    Happiness Lab On How Grades And Rewards are Manipulative

    One of the most popular arguments we hear, and one I’ve made myself, is that to truly stay informed, and avoid living in the bubble of our own political bias, we need to make sure we are getting information from a variety of sources, including ones we may not agree with.

    This study seems to be telling us that isn’t enough, and it can easily be manipulated. If I read an opposing viewpoint, and there’s no reward for doing so, I’m unlikely to really be influenced by it, but if I read an opposing viewpoint and get rewarded for it, I’m more likely to change my mind.

    Now, remember that emotional contagion we might get from social media? What if I shared one side of a political view, and got rewarded by the algorithms or whomever with lots of likes and comments, and the post got shared a whole bunch, but posts from the other side, got none of that? Which side am I more likely to agree with? Right, the one that I got better grades on. Not because it’s true, better, or more accurate, but because I am rewarded for thinking that way. Rewarded the way I’ve been my whole life, since I was a little boy, from the first time my parents wanted me to behave a certain way, all the way through my school years, and for all of my career.

    How hard would that be to fight against? Almost impossible, I’d say. How easy would it be for social media to do it, either the companies themselves, or large groups of users?

    How does that influence what we do see on social media?

  • | |

    The First Rule…

    I was reading Josh Gilliland’s post from yesterday about being careful not to break client confidentiality in your online networking status messages. Here is how the risk of disclosure is possible: a Facebook user posts a status message they deem harmless, such as “I just landed ‘Company A’ as a client and have a bunch…

  • | | |

    Linked – A 4-Day Workweek? A Test Run Shows a Surprising Result

    Hint – the workers got just as much done in 32 hours than they did in 40. But, could that work everywhere? Let’s look at the approach: “He said the results of Perpetual Guardian’s trial showed that when hiring staff, supervisors should negotiate tasks to be performed, rather than basing contracts on hours new employees…

  • |

    Linked – Workers use unapproved messaging apps to get their work done

    This is one of those statistics that should jump off the page and worry the heck out of people in HR, and especially the eDiscovery industry. “The study found that almost two-thirds (64 percent) of the respondents use their mobile devices for work-related communications — even though 32 percent of the respondents said they are…

  • Links (weekly)

    How One Judge Sees E-Discovery tags: Litsupport MM Lawyers Talking About e-Discovery? Not So Much. tags: Litsupport MM Back to Basics – eDiscovery Insight tags: Litsupport MM A Bit About Deduplication tags: LitSupport MM eDiscovery in America – A Legend in the Making tags: LitSupport MM Forbes Cover Story Spells Out Why You Must Be…

  • |

    Follow The Leader

    Last year it was AccessData acquiring Summation, and now that they are releasing their new version of Summation Pro, fully integrated with the FTK backend that takes you from forensic acquisition straight through to attorney review,  I guess this should come as no shock. Guidance Software to Acquire CaseCentral Actually, this is good news as…

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)