Summation Training Classes

I’m done with my first attempt at doing some Summation training. Had one class yesterday afternoon, another this morning. The goal was to do 90 minutes on the very basics, what the program does, how to navigate around, do some basic searching, edit the summaries, add notes to transcripts, etc.

I’ve learned a couple of things, and naturally, I felt the need to share, and note them here for my own reference.

Probably the first thing I learned is that feedback is useful, but it’s hard to take. I don’t necessarily think the breakdown of what I covered in 90 minutes was all that good. I think it needed to be broken up more, so that the audience was broken up more. Unfortunately, we just sort of threw the attendance open to anyone who was interested, so we got a mix, in both classes, of people who had never even opened the program with people who have been using it, albeit not as an Admin, longer than I have. It’s impossible to satisfy both of those audiences, but yesterday I tried. That was a mistake. Luckily, or not so luckily depending on how you feel, our web developer built a beautiful application for scheduling and registering classes, that includes evaluations that can be sent to attendees immediately after the class is over, and are viewable by the instructor as soon as they are done. I saw the negative feedback about yesterday’s class before I even went home last night. Since I had tried to skim over the beginning to get to the stuff toward the end that would be more useful to the more experienced folks, I lost those new people completely, and their feedback showed that.

That was hard to take, but it did allow me to go home and think a bit about how I could do things differently today. I made some small tweaks, vowed to myself not to skim the beginning, in fact I added about 5 minutes at the very beginning to talk about what Summation is at it’s very core (a way to gather all the electronic discovery documents in one place, and electronically review them, summarize them, code them and produce them.), and just generally tried to explain more about they why’s of the program as opposed to just the how’s. The feedback from this class was better.

Naturally, one of the biggest suggestions was to slow down, which is why I don’t want to try to do this again in this exact form. Part of that is the nerves from not having been in front of a group like this in a few years, but part of that was trying to get through everything in the allotted time.

The other reason I want to change the format is that I want to try and do lunch hour sessions. Bring your lunch and we’ll talk about searching in depth for an hour, or transcripts, or tagging, or, back at that very basic level, what Summation does and why you might find yourself using it. I think that’s the better way to go. We’ll see if I get agreement on that. 🙂

Similar Posts

  • It’s not like TV

    One of the stories I like to tell people about working in Litigation Support is the conversation I had with someone shortly after I made the transition. Upon hearing my description of the job, and my reference to handling electronic evidence, I was asked if it was like when they do the computer forensics stuff…

  • |

    Linked: What If We Just Stopped Being So Available?

    This is really the thing. We all know that our devices are with us all the time, and we all know that everyone else knows. So when the notification pops up, there’s an instantaneous thought process that we all go through.

    And no, it’s not is this important or can it wait? The actual thought process is “they know I see this and are probably expecting a response”

    However the article below also points out that much of the time, that’s isn’t true. Someone was just reaching out and there is no hurry or even an expectation of immediate response but we don’t know that. So, we either drop everything to reply or we apologize for any delay in replying.

    Which makes no sense.

    I’ve been involved in direct work with clients in half-day training, or multi-hours long workshops and replied to an email afterwards with an “I’m sorry, I was tied up” opening.

    Yes, I’m apologizing for doing my job and paying attention to it.

    How dumb is that?

  • Documentation

    I promised to keep you all updated on the great documentation project of 2005. I’ve decided to break the documentation of job duties into time periods. There’s a separate list of everything that needs to be done on a daily basis, weekly or bi-weekly basis, monthly basis yearly basis and, finally, a list of on-going…

  • |

    Linked – Law Firms Start Training Summer Associates on Using Generative AI

    I’ve been saying this to anyone who will listen to me rant about it. Your IT or Training and Development teams can only go so far when it comes to training for AI. We can do some training around prompting, show them where to click to enter a prompt, and even show them how to integrate the AI responses into their work. 

    What we can’t do is help them judge the results and iterate their prompts based on the results. That requires expertise in your practice area. That can only come from other lawyers. It’s also the much larger learning curve for working with AI. 

  • | |

    100%

    I got an email today with the results from part 2 of the Summation Certified Trainer Exam. Yes, I passed with a 100%. The email didn’t include any information on when I’d be getting the project to download and work on, but I’m hoping it will be pretty soon. This time of year is somewhat…

  • |

    Are The “Big Four” Coming For Your Firm?

    Short answer, yes. This has been the big question this past week, after EY purchased a UK based Legal Service Provider, Riverview. There have been more than a few takes, in many different directions, but I found the last paragraph of Mark Cohen’s take to sync with my own experiences, which I’ll explain later.  …

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.