Kroll ESI Trends Survey

Despite the fact that we’ve been talking about electronic discovery, and the FRCP were changed 4 years ago to account for eDiscovery, apparently things are still a mess out there in the real world, according to the 2010 ESI Trends Survey from Kroll:

Seventy-seven percent of companies are not confident in the repeatability and defensibility of their Electronically Stored Information (ESI) Strategy, attributable to the fact that more than half (56 percent) of companies do not have or do not know if their organization has a data map or inventory of where all their data is stored, only one-third (38 percent) have tested their policies, and nearly half (45 percent) do not know if their policies have been tested. Companies are creating policies, but are not taking the important next step of making sure all the necessary protocols have been followed and testing and modifying policies as needed. This is a key finding from the Fourth Annual ESI Trends Report, an independent study commissioned by Kroll Ontrack, the leading provider of information management, legal technologies, and data recovery products and services.

You can download your own copy of the results here.

When is the legal industry going to wake up and realize it is 2010? The legal industry is not going to be able to simply ignore the data gorilla in the room. You will either need to find effective ways to deal with it, or get out of the way so that others can.

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    Another Good Reason to do Social Networking

    On an E-Discovery webinar today, Browning Marean of DLA Piper was talking about the duty of attorneys to be competent to some degree with the technology they were dealing with, when he said the following: “One way to get competent is to associate yourself with people who are competent.” Now he was referring to vendors,…

  • Lit Support Links (weekly)

    Courts Increasingly Cognizant of eDiscovery Burdens, Reject “Gotcha” Sanctions Demands tags: LitSupport MM The Fabric of Inadequate Search & Spoliation Allegations tags: LitSupport MM eDiscovery in Small Cases – The Small Firm Advantage tags: LitSupport MM Da Silva Moore and the Role of ACEDS tags: LitSupport MM eDiscovery Daily Blog: eDiscovery Careers: Achieving Success as…

  • What I’m Sharing (weekly)

    Why Section 230 Matters And How Not To Break The Internet; DOJ 230 Workshop Review Part I The True Cost of Manual Ediscovery: Part One Mental Health in the workplace Mobile Collection: It’s Not Just for iPhones Anymore, Part Four Maze Hackers Publish Texas Law Firm’s Confidential Data Blockchain Will Affect eDiscovery (But Probably Not…

  • |

    Ethics Revisited

    I know, I know, it was just a few days ago that I wondered if I could go back to just working at the help desk after sitting in the session about ethics in e-discovery. Truth is, even there, I was subject to more stringent ethical rules simply by virtue of working at a law…

  • The things I’ve seen

    This looks interesting: We’re calling it Dabble, with emphasis on the Db: it’s a database system for dabblers. We’d naturally be happy if professional developers, DBAs, and business analysts find our system useful, but we won’t be satisfied until we have something that works for everyone in the millions of small businesses and teams for…

  • Links (weekly)

    The Social Age of Evidence Collection tags: LitSupport MM The EDRM Buyer’s Guide – Part III tags: LitSupport MM 10 Ways to Develop Yourself Photographically tags: Photography MM 4 Networking Mistakes You Don’t Know You’re Making tags: Career MM How “Dark” is E-Discovery Pricing? tags: LitSupport MM Marketing a Litigation Support / eDiscovery Department within…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)