No Rooting From the Pressbox

I was watching a conversation on Twitter yesterday between a sports reported for the local paper and some of his followers. They were discussing the number one rule of sport reporters, “No rooting in the pressbox”. He pointed out that eventually you learn to be very detached from the game at hand, looking at it as a passive observer, noting all the relevant facts, and not showing any emotion about whatever is going on. He then talked about how it’s difficult for him, after all these years, to go to a game with his kids as a fan, because it’s not easy to go “be a fan”, he’s so accustomed to being detached while at any game.

It reminded me a bit of a friend of mine from high school/college. He and I spent a lot of time going to the OSU campus bars and seeing all sorts of bands. We were both very interested in both the local and national acts that came through town, and loved music. He was a musician as well, while I never really had the patience to learn to play music very well. (My short-lived career as lead singer of a punk cover band notwithstanding.) The thing was, as we got a little older, and he found himself playing in some bands and being part of the local music scene, when I would see him out at a show, he was much more reserved, almost detached. He was watching how the band played, what they did on stage, how the crowd reacted, etc. He wasn’t just a fan any more, he was actively trying to compare and contrast what he was doing in his career with what was going on in the club.

Why am I blogging about this? I have long wondered if having done some work in trial presentation, having sat in the hot seat, and worked with attorneys on coming up with a presentation strategy for their case, would actually make me a terrible jury candidate. I’ve sat in a court room enough to know that previous experience with the court system is a pretty common question posed to potential jurors from attorneys. They want to know what you know, what your experiences have been like, etc. because it’s relevant to how you might perform as a juror.

I haven’t had the pleasure of being called for jury duty since I’ve been working in this field. I do, however, wonder if an attorney might see a very real possibility that I would be spending my time being detached from the proceedings, watching how each side presents their case, comparing it to things I’ve worked on, making notes on things to maybe try, and to avoid, in future case, as opposed to actually carefully weighing the facts in the case. I also wonder if any attorney who thought that would be right. I imagine it would be difficult to not do that. Not impossible, but difficult. Difficult enough that no attorney would take the chance.

What do you think? Any attorneys want to share some thoughts on the matter?

Similar Posts

  • The Insanity of Forcing Tech Companies to Pay For Linking to News

    I’m sure many of you have already seen the ongoing battle between Facebook, and Google, and the Australian government. The government, mostly at the behest of Rupert Murdoch, is about to pass a law that forces the “big tech” companies to negotiate with news publishers to pay them for the content that is linked to on Google News or on Facebook. 

    I’m hear to argue that this is legitimately insane. 

  • |

    Linked – The Productivity-Trust Paradox

    As I read over the list of six conditions that Drucker believed enabled productivity, I came to the conclusion that I have never worked in a place that provided all six. Usually that last one, being seen as an asset as opposed to a cost, is the easy one to see. Management loves to remind you that you are a cost, especially if you work in a tech or training position. Heck, anything other than a sales position in some organizations is a “cost”, and we all know anyone who isn’t directly billing more hours to a client than they get paid in legal is a cost. As we have seen over the last year, you can do great work, but when shareholders and Boards decide it’s time to cut costs, that great work won’t grant you immunity from mass layoffs.

  • | |

    Resume Metadata

    I had a random thought today while I was processing some e-discovery documents. I stumbled upon a resume, and noticed that the author name didn’t match the name on the resume. That got me thinking. Now, certainly there are plenty of reasons why the author name would not match the name on the resume, things…

  • What I’m Reading (weekly)

    TweetDeck Adds Tweet Confirmation To Help Prevent Social Media Misfires — This is interesting for anyone who manages more than one Twitter account. tags: MM SocNetPres Girding for the E-Savvy Opponent tags: MM LitSupport A Winning Team Needs Several Types of Team Members: eDiscovery Best Practices | eDiscoveryDaily tags: MM LitSupport Why Legal Directors are…

  • Linked – Reimagining The Employee-Employer Deal

    This is the power that more and more employees realize they have. To hire you as an employer and to fire you when you no longer fit their needs. If that bothers you, if that offends your sense of loyalty to the workplace, do me a favor. Go to Google News and search for “layoff”. Do a little light browsing and tell me what loyalty has to do with anything.

  • Shared Links (weekly) Dec. 14, 2025

    For more like this, subscribe to the newsletter and get these links and more in your email.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.