|

A Different Perspective on Social Networks

I can still see you

 

Let’s look at social networking from a different perspective, shall we?

As I’ve made my way around the interwebz recently, I’ve been reading up quit a bit about increasing traffic to a blog, or increasing engagement with your fans, etc. Call it a professional curiosity, as a blogger I’m always interested in the latest best practices, what’s working for others, what isn’t etc., but as I’ve made my way around, I’ve also realized that just about all of the social media advice out there is 100% targeted toward people with something to sell. While some of the advice is still worth checking out, I can’t help but feel overwhelmed by the commercialism of it all.

Look, I’m not against commercialism, every business has to make money, and they do so by selling things. I’m all for that. But even individuals who aren’t trying to sell something have a place in social media. In fact, as someone who’s been blogging for over a dozen years, without it being part of a business, I’d say there are lots of reasons to have a large social media presence any way.  You could almost argue that, in some ways, you are still selling something. You might be selling yourself, making a name for yourself, creating a presence on the internet for yourself so that people who might want to connect with you, opening up new opportunities, or you might be selling an idea or a story. Certainly, in the myriad ways I interact on the internet, I’m sharing information, just because I’m doing it for free doesn’t mean that I don’t care about whether any one reads it or not. Here, I’m sharing thoughts, ideas, and helpful information related to technology, eDiscovery, blogging, and so on. When I started, I thought it was a good way to network with other tech professionals and have a group of people who could share ideas and solutions. I may not work in IT any more, but the thought remains the same.

Over at childabusesurvivor.net, I’m trying to get a message out, that is about me, but is larger than me, that survivors of childhood abuse are not alone and can overcome their past. Drawing attention to that site is something I have a desire to do, because I think the message is an important one.

The problem with most social media advice these days is that it is written by people who do this as their fulltime job. The focus on attracting fans, engaging with them with targeted campaigns in different social networks, and creating good content is all accurate, but the details are unrealistic for someone who works at something else fulltime, and wants to have a family and social life. So we try and implement some of the ideas, but in the end, we can’t always keep up. Life gets in the way,

When we look at the way Facebook has changed how pages can reach, or not reach as the case is increasingly becoming, the same fans who have liked the page, what we see is the commercialization of Facebook as a social network. Those of us who do this to spread ideas, for free, are left out in the cold when it comes to reaching people who prefer to spend their time on Facebook as opposed to visiting various sites or using an RSS feed reader. I’m not about to start spending money to do that, and I don’t have to time to create custom content and run contests to increase engagement on Facebook.

I fully suspect that Twitter, LinkedIn, and other networks will follow suit. They have to make money. They are, as I’ve said about Google before, more or less companies who sell ads. All of the various other tools that they provide, as much as we use and enjoy them, are simply ways to keep you playing in their field so that you can be fed more ads. Again, there’s nothing wrong with that, but we should recognize what it is, and stop trying to pretend that they will always remain open communications platforms.

That’s why I’m not going to spend a lot of time there. I have a variety of tools to automatically add content to the social networks, and I even drop in and interact when I can, but the focus will always be on my own sites.

The trick, however, is reaching people who don’t know about them. That’s where you have to have the presence. A long time ago, a wise evangelist told me that if you really wanted to reach people who were lost, you had to go where they were. You couldn’t just go to church and wonder why no one new ever came to hear your message. You had to take the message wherever people were. When I look at increasing the reach of my ideas, I think that holds true. I need to be on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, etc. but I also have to realize that everyone else is too, including many companies who have much more money and resources than a single blogger has.

It’s not fair, but then again, I don’t need to convince a million people to buy my product.  Whether it’s the thousands who follow my Child Abuse Survivor site on Twitter and Facebook, or just my cousins and I chatting about sports on my sports page, I’m getting something out of the effort by simply connecting with people who I might not otherwise have the chance to, and it’s those connections that make the effort worthwhile, even if I don’t have a million page views.

 

Similar Posts

  • |

    Happiness Lab On How Grades And Rewards are Manipulative

    One of the most popular arguments we hear, and one I’ve made myself, is that to truly stay informed, and avoid living in the bubble of our own political bias, we need to make sure we are getting information from a variety of sources, including ones we may not agree with.

    This study seems to be telling us that isn’t enough, and it can easily be manipulated. If I read an opposing viewpoint, and there’s no reward for doing so, I’m unlikely to really be influenced by it, but if I read an opposing viewpoint and get rewarded for it, I’m more likely to change my mind.

    Now, remember that emotional contagion we might get from social media? What if I shared one side of a political view, and got rewarded by the algorithms or whomever with lots of likes and comments, and the post got shared a whole bunch, but posts from the other side, got none of that? Which side am I more likely to agree with? Right, the one that I got better grades on. Not because it’s true, better, or more accurate, but because I am rewarded for thinking that way. Rewarded the way I’ve been my whole life, since I was a little boy, from the first time my parents wanted me to behave a certain way, all the way through my school years, and for all of my career.

    How hard would that be to fight against? Almost impossible, I’d say. How easy would it be for social media to do it, either the companies themselves, or large groups of users?

    How does that influence what we do see on social media?

  • Morning news with my coffee

    SafeWeb users are vulnerable. Oh the irony. Should we start calling them (not so)SafeWeb? *L* The Register is baffled by ICQ “hack”. Was it hacked or wasn’t it? You be the judge… Trillian version .725 is out, the latest in the AIM connection wars. Why aren’t the Olympics over yet? Haven’t we had enough drama,…

  • Interesting reading for today

    Interesting reading for today: Via Scripting News I found this piece on what may be in store for the internet in 2002. I’ve seen a number of these type articles lately, for obvious reasons, and most of them are crap! This one actually understands that there’s good stuff out here, away from all the big…

  • How I use OneNote

    Per MarcV’s request in the comments for that last post. Here’s a brief description of what I’m using OneNote for. I’ll break it down into two sections, because I use my official work copy on my desktop at work, and my free “thanks for beta testing and attending the rollout event” copy on my personal…

  • |

    Linux Equivalent Project

    Regarding my previous posts about installing Ubuntu, which I really do like, by the way, I just got a Twitter message from Bubbasan pointing me to the Linux Equivalent Project. This is a pretty cool idea, and there’s some things on there I really hadn’t though about at all, but will be taking a look…

  • Is Chrome A Little Too Secure?

    Sure, I get why Google would make certain features available in Chrome and try to protect it’s users from phishing, browser highjacking, and drive by download attempts. But one of the security features also assures that I have to keep some other browser available on any machine. When staying at a hotel or other place…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)