|

Early Impressions of LinkedIn Publishing

linkedinAs you may know, I decided to give LinkedIn’s publishing platform a try after it was opened up to me, and many others.

To further the experiment, I also pushed out links to just about every social network I could, pointing to the LinkedIn piece. I pimped it more than I usually pimp a post from this site, though I will admit there have been a couple of posts that I pimped just as hard.

The results were pretty mixed. The number of people who saw the link on the LinkedIn site is a bit higher than the number who would see it just through the RSS feed, but about the same as the number who see it on Twitter, and Facebook, though I can’t know how many people actually see it on Twitter. The engagement level, based on the counts from the share buttons on the site, was about the same as one of those posts I feel really strongly about here and share widely.

All in all, I’d say, in terms of reaching a large number of people, it’s about running even to having a blog for most people. Obviously, your well-connected influencers (as defined by LinkedIn) see much, much more traffic to their LinkedIn posts. For the rest of us, I think it probably helps reach some folks who don’t use Facebook, Twitter or RSS feeds, but it’s hardly a world-changer.

As far as a publishing platform, my opinion is a bit of a mixed bag as well.

On the plus side, it’s easy to use, and the posts actually stay on as part of your LinkedIn profile, shown above. Status updates, unlike other social networks, seem to just disappear into the ether on LinkedIn, so sharing a link to a post is a short term shot in the dark really. I’ve been frustrated myself when I catch a glimpse of an article that seems like it might be interesting, only to be unable to locate it when I go back later, even when I look at the profile of the person who shared it. Having direct links to your writing, on your profile, is kind of nice. They remain a permanent record of your writings on your professional profile.

On the downside, the notifications feature has become a disaster. Kevin O’Keefe has already written about the same thing so I won’t bore you with the details, but I will share that one of my contacts has started republishing all of his content, across a few websites, into LinkedIn publishing. Every single time I look at the site, the notification flag is up, and the list of notifications is dominated by his posts. I may have to disconnect just so I can see notifications from other people again, which seems a sad thing to say about a site dedicated to connecting you with other professionals! The other downside, of course, is that post now belongs to LinkedIn. I have no control over it, and if they decide to start removing posts from my profile page, I’m powerless to do anything about it. That’s not just a downside of LinkedIn by the way, it’s a down side of writing on any website that is not your own.

So, yeah I will probably use it again. I think having a few articles on the site next to my profile can increase the value of my LinkedIn profile, but it won’t be a major area of focus for me. I’m still sticking with my own blogs for that, and avoid bugging my connections with post notifications too much as well!

Similar Posts

  • |

    Happiness Lab On How Grades And Rewards are Manipulative

    One of the most popular arguments we hear, and one I’ve made myself, is that to truly stay informed, and avoid living in the bubble of our own political bias, we need to make sure we are getting information from a variety of sources, including ones we may not agree with.

    This study seems to be telling us that isn’t enough, and it can easily be manipulated. If I read an opposing viewpoint, and there’s no reward for doing so, I’m unlikely to really be influenced by it, but if I read an opposing viewpoint and get rewarded for it, I’m more likely to change my mind.

    Now, remember that emotional contagion we might get from social media? What if I shared one side of a political view, and got rewarded by the algorithms or whomever with lots of likes and comments, and the post got shared a whole bunch, but posts from the other side, got none of that? Which side am I more likely to agree with? Right, the one that I got better grades on. Not because it’s true, better, or more accurate, but because I am rewarded for thinking that way. Rewarded the way I’ve been my whole life, since I was a little boy, from the first time my parents wanted me to behave a certain way, all the way through my school years, and for all of my career.

    How hard would that be to fight against? Almost impossible, I’d say. How easy would it be for social media to do it, either the companies themselves, or large groups of users?

    How does that influence what we do see on social media?

  • Easy Prediction – AI Will Eat Most of the Ways We Get Our News

    This should not surprise anyone. The ability of anyone to create an avalanche of content capable of overwhelming any algorithmic curation is here. It exists, and it is happening. It’s only going to get worse. Fake profiles sharing fake stories from AI-written content farms will eventually overwhelm the number of people online and make every network worthless. If you think there aren’t already thousands and thousands of these, you haven’t been paying attention. ChatGPT just made it easier to do.

    The only thing we’ll be able to fall back on is trusting the people we know personally. Assuming we can tell the difference.

  • Shared Links (weekly) Oct 25, 2020

    A Call For Greater Investment In Workplace Mental Health: Leaders From Facebook, YouTube, Best Buy, Verizon Media And More Weigh In

    Secure Phone Disposal

    Mental Health Benefits Are A Long-Term Strategy, Not A Contingency Plan

    Council Post: Let’s Talk About Mental Wellness, Even At Work

    October’s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery

    How to Network Professionally During the Coronavirus Pandemic

    Facebook Download Your Information Function Omits Significant Amounts of Evidence

    You Need a Personal Highlight Reel

    The Powerful Purpose of Introverts: Why the World Needs You to Be You

    How to create employee accountability without in-person interaction

    Don’t Change What Works

    Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for October 2020

    Mental health improves in employees after company moves to 4-day work week

  • |

    Linked – A Feeding Frenzy to Deface WordPress Sites

    If you haven’t updated your WordPress install to 4.7.2, you might want to do that, assuming that it hasn’t already been hacked and defaced. Seems like that’s only a matter of time. https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2017/02/rest-api-exploit-feeding-frenzy-deface-wordpress-sites/ Image by Phil Oakley Follow these topics: Blogging, Links

  • |

    Linked – Instagram Will Now Archive All of Your Stories

    This is a very different way of implementing Stories, actually: “Instagram is changing the way Stories are preserved for posterity. Stories Archive will automatically save your Stories for the future, and Stories Highlights will let you choose certain elements of Stories to share with the world. So, if Stories are your bag, today is a…

  • |

    Social Networks and Job Searching

    Interesting food for thought from Forbes the other day, that has drawn quite a bit of attention around the online world. What Prospective Employers Hope to See in Your Facebook Account. The chart displaying the reasons candidates were rejected has obviously gotten the most attention, but the other chart, about what they saw on a…

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)