In my experience, and in the experience of many others as well, unfocused attempts at visualization over raw, unreduced data produce visualizations that are not particularly useful for security operations. Â Visualization does have tremendous potential to bring value to security operations when leveraged properly. Â Performing data reduction by posing specific, targeted, incisive queries into the data provides a good starting point for producing visualizations of high value to security operations. Â Get the picture?
The same is true for eDiscovery data. I’ve seen many a user go straight to a visualization of email connections, for example, over their entire dataset, and then dismiss the use of visualizations because there’s nothing useful in it. Which, of course, there isn’t. You need to define what kinds of connections you’re looking for (Over a date range, to/from one particular custodian of interest, etc.) before you start looking at the pictures that are going to show them to you.
Employees dealing with trauma outside of work often carry that trauma with them into work, and we need resources to help them navigate that. What do we offer people experiencing trauma at work who carry that trauma into the rest of their lives?Â
Maybe the better question is, what do we owe them?Â
In order to be a customer of Netflix, Disney+, etc. you need broadband internet access, which runs through those wireline facilities. The ISP is already paying for using the right of way and passing that expense on to you. Any service, streaming video, audio, websites you visit, etc. is using the connection that has already been paid for and passed on to you. Taxing each individual service simply creates a situation where there is one connection using the infrastructure, being paid for over and over again and then being passed back to you over and over again.
How in demand must ediscovery skills be that you can have one website dedicated to Litigation Support careers conducting a talent drive, while another hroup is launching another site dedicated to ediscovery careers? I’d say there must be some serious demand out there, wouldn’t you? Now, since I’m not really in the market, I haven’t…
There seems to be a pretty serious security flaw in Greasemonkey, I’d highly recommend disabling it, getting the update and then waiting for the various scripts that will undoubtedly no longer work, to be updated themselves. Tags: Greasemonkey Follow these topics: Uncategorized
At least that’s what the rule is now in the State of Michigan. I agree with the commentary at the end of the article. Commentary: It is disappointing that the Michigan legislature does not require licensed professional investigators to be certified in computer forensics before they can provide computer forensic services. The law raises considerable…
Sometimes, things happen. Circumstances change, what we want from our careers changes, and what the current employer can offer us changes. There’s no shame in it, and there shouldn’t be any hard, or awkward feelings about it.
I’d love to see companies get on board with that, but that’s going to require we see our people as people first, and labor inputs second. I’m not so sure some managers are capable of that.
