Legal Books and Gavel
|

Linked: This May be the Biggest Looming Issue in eDiscovery That Few People Are Talking About

Doug is correct that this is a looming issue:

Linking to cloud-based office files within the organization is different – those files are within the “possession, custody and control” of the responding party. However, just as linked web sources may be changed or deleted at some point, the same holds true for linked office files. Unlike attachments, which are a snapshot of the file at the time of that correspondence, linked files are evergreen: they can continue to be edited or even deleted, so the evidence as it existed at the time of the email may be lost.

Where I will disagree with Doug though is when he says few people are talking about this. I have this conversation with clients, peers, and others, every single day, sometimes multiple times in a day.

Everyone is talking about it, but they aren’t talking about it in regards to email, rather it is within collaboration platforms like Teams and Slack where shared files are always links, and those links may be in a variety of locations.

Those linked files matter, but not in the same way an email attachment used it, and legal teams are going to have to understand all of that. Is your team ready?

This May be the Biggest Looming Issue in eDiscovery That Few People Are Talking About

Similar Posts

  • Links (weekly)

    New Twitter: 25 Tips and Tricks for Savvy Tweeters tags: SocNetPres MM Shadowing in Litigation Support tags: LitSupport MM You do want to know what eDiscovery / eDisclosure is costing you, surely? tags: LitSupport MM Ediscovery Production Without Review tags: LitSupport MM eDiscovery: Automating the Litigation Process tags: LitSupport MM Top Ten eDiscovery Predictions for…

  • | |

    Never Assume Searches Are Accurate Without Verifying

    Technology, especially M365 technology, changes all the time. It’s vast and complicated, and things get broken when new versions are rolled out. When dealing with eDiscovery, security, privacy, etc., we have to stay on top of those changes to understand new features and ensure the old ones still work the same way. 

    Don’t assume the old ones will always work the same way. I can tell you from this and plenty of other experiences they often don’t.

  • | | |

    Linked – A 4-Day Workweek? A Test Run Shows a Surprising Result

    Hint – the workers got just as much done in 32 hours than they did in 40. But, could that work everywhere? Let’s look at the approach: “He said the results of Perpetual Guardian’s trial showed that when hiring staff, supervisors should negotiate tasks to be performed, rather than basing contracts on hours new employees…

  • |

    Linked: How to Build a Rock-Solid Cybersecurity Culture

    I find this approach to building awareness around security refreshing, because I’m betting the answers to these questions may not be what you’d expect: “Go ahead — survey a few co-workers with this question,” says Gamblin, a principal security engineer with Kenna Security, as he plants his tongue firmly in his cheek. “Were you satisfied…

  • |

    Linked: Does your remote team really need an in-person offsite?

    As the future of work settles in a bit, in the sense that we are now working remotely by choice more than by COVID requirement, we are seeing a large shift toward the desire to work remotely. I believe that shift is everyone listed above. For introverts, people with disabilities, people with adult or child care requirements, working remotely is bliss. (I did it even before COVID.) We can still do the other things that are important in our lives without being forced to a specific location, and we can do it without being forced to be in the same physical space as people we may or may not like.

    The problem is, and we see this clearly in the discussion below, doing things in-person is how we’ve always done things. The custom of having a quarterly or annual offsite was designed in a workplace that has always catered to extroverts and people who were available to be at the office for longer and longer hours. That culture has always excluded people. Think about the after-work drinks custom. How many moms got to attend instead of hurrying home to their kids, and how many men got to attend simply because somewhere there was a mom hurrying home to take care of the kids instead of them? How many introverted employees never showed up, or showed up out of a sense of guilt, quietly sipped their drink, and left as soon as it seemed polite to do so? And don’t even get me started on the number of employees in recovery who cannot, and should not, go out drinking with the group. 

    But, what did you hear about these events? They were great, we had a blast, we really got to bond with other folks from the team, etc. That feedback all comes from the minority that actually gets to go, and enjoys being in a group setting.

  • |

    Linked – Bill de Blasio: Tech companies ‘owe it to the nation’ to share data with law enforcement

    The thing that bugs me the most about this situation is not the argument about what Apple should or shouldn’t be required to do, it’s the number of politicians who feel the need to pipe in on behalf of the government, who clearly have no idea how encryption works. The whole point of encrypting data…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)