Hand holding a phone screen with AI apps next to a coffee cup on a table.
| |

Linked – AI Agents Come For White Collar Jobs

One story in the newsletter is linked below, but it’s interesting. As I watched Mircosoft’s Copilot Wave 2 announcement earlier this week, I thought that the description of Copilot agents does not match the positioning of previous Microsoft messages about AI.

How often have we watched a C-level person from Microsoft remind us that AI will not take our jobs but help us do our jobs better? It was there to assist us, not work for us.

“It’s even in the name, Copilot.”

When I heard them talk about agents being our team members and eventually managing other agents and their tasks, I immediately thought this was no longer a copilot. If it’s a team member, that means fewer human team members to do the work.

To grab a quote from the article:

AI agents will increasingly take on significant portions of white-collar work. This would transform industries like law, medicine, and software development, leaving humans to focus more on high-level strategy and oversight.

There are two points I want to make about this, and neither of them is positive.

  1. The author goes on to describe how these agents will interact and perform mundane tasks like tech support, answering customer questions, etc. But no one wants them. Customers do not want to interact with bots and AI agents. They’ll be given no choice because businesses will find them cheaper and easier to deal with than employees, but we’ll all hate them a little more.
  2. This promise that humans can focus on high-level strategy and oversight is misleading. Consider your run-of-the-mill corporation. How many people work there? What percentage of them have input to the company’s high-level strategy? It’s pretty tiny. If you work in response to requests, that’s not focusing on strategy. If an AI agent can respond to those exact requests, what is your role in the future?

The quote above is used in the article, but it’s originally from an Andreesen Horowitz article. It highlights three prominent industries we previously believed were irreplaceable. You can’t replace lawyers, doctors, and programmers with AI; it’s not intelligent enough to do the work.

In some ways, that’s true. In many other ways, it isn’t. Could an AI agent take information from a user and draw up a will, a contract, a divorce, or other legal work? Absolutely. There are products out there doing those kinds of things. How soon will clients use AI to answer most legal questions without a per-hour fee or get medical information without a doctor’s visit?

How soon before AI writes most code?

I’d argue that those things are a given. That work is going away, and businesses will not hesitate to employ fewer humans as AI matures into a space where it takes on more tasks and coordinates complex workflows with little human involvement.

Read more about what the folks at The Tech Buzz had to say about it, too:

https://www.thetech.buzz/p/ai-agents-for-white-collar-jobs

Similar Posts

  • |

    Anyone Else Having Problems with Delicious?

    I’ve searched the blogs, and the forums and don’t see where anyone else is having this issue, but over the last few days I’ve saved a number of links to Delicious, but they don’t show up in my list of bookmarks, nor are they included in the RSS feed of recent bookmarks. (Thus they don’t…

  • What I’m Sharing (weekly)

    AI May Not Kill Your Job—Just Change It Three Steps to Reduce Insider Threats to High Value Legal Content Ransomware Attack Impacts Legal Software Provider Trialworks Email Threats Poised to Haunt Security Pros into the next Decade Facebook wants to get into healthcare. What could possibly go wrong? Hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!! Umm, no. Technology When Ransomware Strikes:…

  • A few improvements

    I’ve been busy the past couple of days. I even spent more than 10 hours at work today, as part of a huge software version rollout, working alongside the rest of the IS staff. But, I have noticed a couple of things in my feed reader, and if you’ve been paying attention to the link…

  • Linked – Skills, Skills, Skills

    I’ve said it before, but let me repeat it. Regarding technology, what you learned in college is probably pointless within 2-3 years. What you did at work 5-10 years ago is useless. Continuous learning and upskilling are not optional. Talking about skills-based hiring is a new trend, but it’s the trend that made sense even before it became popular. Your degrees and resume don’t matter nearly as much as what you can do right now and what you can learn going forward.

    This is the business world we live in now. There is no cushy job where you can do the same thing in the same place for 30 years. That’s ancient history, and our career plans and hiring practices must match the current reality.

  • Get the Flock out

    I downloaded Flock, the “Social Browser”, last night and have been playing with it a bit to see how it works. In terms of being a “social” browser, it definitely is that, with the blogging, photo uploading, RSS feeds and other social network plug-ins incorporated directly in to the browser. On the other hand, I haven’t…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)