EDRM version 2.0 Draft

Worth Reading – EDRM Invites Global Community to Shape EDRM 2.0 via Public Comment

Those of you in the eDiscovery arena might already be aware of this new public comment period for the EDRM version 2.0. I took a quick look at it, and the one thing I will say is that I agree that eDiscovery is part of the Information Governance strategy for every firm, so I was glad to see that model as the underlying thread.

It also helps, when thinking about AI, to consider it within the full IG scope rather than only as an eDiscovery problem. Because it’s likely not that big of an eDiscovery problem, yet, but it’s absolutely an IG problem.

What do you think of it?

EDRM Invites Global Community to Shape EDRM 2.0 via Public Comment

Similar Posts

  • Linked – Female Expats on Why They Left Paul Weiss, Hogan, Paul Hastings

    The question I’ve always had though, is what exactly changed and when did it change? Because I can’t believe most women go to law school and graduate planning on working at a large law firm for a few years and then leaving to go solo, in-house, public sector, or teaching at law school, despite the fact that it happens a lot! Again, in my anecdotal experience, it happens much more often than it does for male associates.

    If we have a system that “works” for male lawyers this much more often than female or gender non-binary lawyers, maybe it’s not a good system.

    If you’re a female attorney who’s left a law firm and wants to share your experience and reasons, I’d love to hear about it and possibly write about it. (You can reach out to me privately if you’d like to remain anonymous.) I am truly curious about what it’s like to graduate law school versus the reality of law firm life a few years later, and what law firms could have done to keep you.

  • |

    Linked: Google routinely hides emails from litigation by CCing attorneys, DOJ alleges

    I mean, it seems so simple, and yet so genius. But also so very unethical:

    “In a program called ‘Communicate with Care,’ Google trains and directs employees to add an attorney, a privileged label, and a generic ‘request’ for counsel’s advice to shield sensitive business communications, regardless of whether any legal advice is actually needed or sought. Often, knowing the game, the in-house counsel included in these Communicate-with-Care emails does not respond at all,” the DOJ told the court. The fact that attorneys often don’t reply to the emails “underscor[es] that these communications are not genuine requests for legal advice but rather an effort to hide potential evidence,” the DOJ said.”

  • Exterro Covers LegalTech

    I’ve seen a number of posts, tweets, and articles come out of the LegalTech New york last week, but I don’t believe anyone had the ediscovery field covered quite the way Exterro did. Not only do they have some coverage of a keynote, they also have numerous interviews, video and text with thought–leaders in this…

  • What I’m Sharing (weekly)

    The EDRM Has a New Home: With Mary Mack and Kaylee Walstad Gathering social media as evidence in e-discovery A roundup of the Nuix User Exchange: discovery is more than just…discovery Coming up on 21 years of Cluetrain Windows 7’s End of Life is real and the rumors of life after death are somewhat exaggerated…

  • What I’m Sharing (weekly)

    On-Premise Tech’s Swan Song? Pandemic Places Greater Emphasis on the Cloud Zoom needs to clean up its privacy act What You Don’t Know Will Hurt You: Technology Competence in the Time of COVID-19 Privacy Tip #232 – Spam Phone Calls Rampant for Remote Workers – a lot of us may get more calls on our…

  • Shared Links (weekly) Dec. 20, 2020

    I’m leaving as CEO due to mental health Five Must-Read eDiscovery Cases from 2020 Microsoft Wants You to Ditch Your Passwords in 2021 Simple Considerations for Not-So-Simple Search Term Translation Five Common Mistakes In Keyword Search: How Many Do You Make? How To Be Open With Your Boss About Your Mental Health: 4 Tips It’s Never…

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)