Random thoughts

Cory points out the fallacy of broadband becoming more popular when the “content” is available. He’s right, it’s completely wrong. This is the same theory that Hollings’ bill is based on, that once we have secure content, Hollywood and the RIAA will make it available online, and then people will sign up for broadband in droves. No they won’t. I have broadband so I can easily create content and move it around quickly. I suspect that many other site owners will tell you the same thing. I don’t give a rat’s ass about digital film and music, I care about being able to use FTP quickly for my site, and for getting files from good freeware authors. That’s the real juice of the internet! I already have music and film without my $45 per month ‘net connection.

Just finished reading Small Pieces Loosely Joined yesterday. It’s good, go get it! David addresses some of these sorts of ideas, that the internet allows actual conversations and groups to form, that “mass-media” is missing the whole idea of what makes the internet different from broadcast. If we allow them to continue thinking this way, and regulating the internet as though it was a broadcast medium, we’re going to lose all the freedom we currently enjoy online. (Like the freedom to cheaply make your own website and create your own community.).

In that same vein, this story from the LA Times (registration required) talks about weblogs this way:

It’s sort of old wine in new skins, since the bloggers are basically a narcissistic throwback to an easily recognizable American type, the 19th century cranks who turned out mountains of self-published pamphlets (link via Corante)

But it’s not, because the ideas we have as bloggers get refined by the feedback we get from readers. That’s why the Web is different, you have few barriers to entry and you have an actual conversation with your readers. When you get my “pamphlet”, you have the opportunity to leave a comment and add your own voice to the ideas, for all to see. In the 19th century, you didn’t have that. In big newspapers, you don’t have that. Once again, we have someone looking at the internet as only a broadcast medium and not a marketplace.

Similar Posts

  • Ouch

    Home today with a killer migraine, probably won’t be much in the way of updates, I’m going to be trying to sleep it off! Here’s hoping the pager doesn’t wake me with a work emergency! Follow these topics: Uncategorized

  • Server 2003

    Microsoft Releases Windows Server 2003 To Manufacturing. Hmm, I think I’ll have to keep an eye on how this works out for early adopters, if I can find any. 🙂 If nothing else, it would be nice to grab a demo copy of this and see how it works for myself. I’ll have to settle…

  • A random thought

    Just something that occurred to me today when I had someone looking at my Flickr photos. I purposely resize all the photos I put up in my Flickr account, and also in the galleries to be smaller than the original, for a couple of reasons. One, so they load quicker, two, to keep the storage…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)