|

Important Lesson in Networking

My lunch hour today wasn’t anything overly special. I met up with a peer from another firm, to chat and share some information. I had emailed her last week after my unexpected trip forced me to miss the most recent ILTA Litigation Technology Peer Group meeting, because the topic, Trial Technology, was one I had some interest in, and I wondered if she picked up anything useful.

Like I said, nothing really earth-shattering there, but it made me think about how many people approach groups like this one. Seems like there’s a small core group, myself included, that is generally there each month, tends to be involved in doing things like the RSS presentation I did a while back, and who just know each other pretty well. Then there’s a larger group, folks who show up occasionally, depending on the discussion topic. Folks who see the meeting invitation and make their decision to go based on what they might learn from the speaker alone.

There’s nothing really wrong with that per se, certainly we’re all busy and need to try to use our time wisely. On the other hand, if I was approaching the meetings like that, I wouldn’t have developed relationships that allowed me to learn about things that I missed, and I wouldn’t have the contacts that I do know. I would have to just accept that I missed an opportunity to learn something last week and done nothing about it, but because I had invested the time in this group, I had another option.

If you have the opportunity to be involved in a group like this, I highly encourage you invest the time. You never know when a contact will help you out the way CB (Not using her name, since she doesn’t even know I’m writing this!) helped me out today. Thanks!

Technorati Tags: Networking

Similar Posts

  • Linked – The Perks of a High-Documentation, Low-Meeting Work Culture

    This is where having a lot of meetings becomes a problem. When you need to do focused work, you wind up doing it after hours. That’s not sustainable. The other thing that this constant multitasking does is it feeds on itself. Picture this, if you will.

    You schedule a meeting to discuss the project status. Half of the people at that meeting are squeezing it in between other meetings and thus are multi-tasking during the status meeting. You can watch them on camera answering emails while the discussion is going on, or they are wily enough to do it off-camera but aren’t engaged.

    After the meeting, someone sends an email summarizing the conversation, which is responded to by one of the people who were multi-tasking with questions they didn’t ask during the meeting. This prompts another meeting to go over those questions.

    Might it work better if the project status was done in writing, asynchronously, and the meeting never needed to happen?

  • | |

    Speaking of ILTA

    The conference session schedule was released today, an yup, not only will I be attending, I’ll be speaking a couple of times as well. In looking over the details, obviously I’m drawn to the Litigation Support sessions at first, and frankly, I’m a little underwhelmed by the titles. Seems like some of the same topics…

  • Can’t Live Like This Forever

    I was reading this article the other day, Turnover is Turnover: What Churning Employees Says About Your Culture, when this passage struck me: Even now, with a new title and lots more money, she said that she will eventually leave. Working 50-60 hours is commonplace, and she said that she cannot live the rest of…

  • | |

    Reading – Federal Appeals Court Says Doc Review Is NOT Real Legal Work

    “The parties themselves agreed at oral argument that an individual who, in the course of reviewing discovery documents, undertakes tasks that could otherwise be performed entirely by a machine cannot be said to engage in the practice of law.” There is a potential of some very far-reaching implications from this ruling. If doc review can…

  • Linked – Retention Crisis: 46% of Managers Want Out – What’s your plan?

    In my opinion, most managers are in an untenable position. The people reporting to them are expected to be engaged, productive, and successful. That requires managers who care about them and provide flexible solutions that block any obstacles to their work being done in an engaged and productive way. 

    But wait—the C-suite is one of those obstacles! Layoffs, ridiculous RTO mandates, demands to “do more with less,” and a focus on shareholder profits above everything else don’t encourage employee engagement. They destroy it, but managers are expected to toe the line and support what’s happening. 

    That seems pretty stressful to me. 

  • Shared Links (weekly) Jan. 17, 2021

    Spirited ESI Search Arguments

    What’s in a Name (or Hash Value)?

    Ultimate Guide to Mental Health in the Workplace

    Social media managers grapple with burnout, leaving the industry

    Networking Tips for Business Professionals Working Remotely

    Where does the cybersecurity skills gap stem from and what can businesses do to overcome it?

    Client Portals Are Now an Essential Service for Law Firms to Offer

    The New Battles to Come Over Working From Home

    How to Support Your Remote Teams’ Mental Health in 2021 and Beyond

    5 Online Learning Platforms to Help Bolster your Resume

    New Microsoft Teams Features for 2021

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)