| |

Outlook for the Mac coming

MS Office for Mac is finally just going to go ahead and replace Entourage with Outlook.

For the e-discovery folks, there is just one question. Does that mean Office for Mac users will have a PST that is easily transferable to Windows? Does anyone know? Getting email from a Mac into a form we can work with tends to be one of our complaints, and anything that gives us one less complaint can only be good, right? 😉

Similar Posts

  • Shortest Trial Ever!

    This weekend, in between bouts of digging out from the snow, I decided to give Google Calendar Sync a try. I had been using Gsyncit to synchromize my Google Calendar with my Outlook, but I was interested to see if I could use this instead to synch my home Outlook calendar with Google, as well…

  • Per request

    Per Dianna’s request, in the comments, here are my first impressions of IntraVnews: First off, I’m running it with Outlook 2003, on an older type laptop running Windows 2000, with only 128MB of RAM, so YMMV. But, I’ve found that with about 80 channels subscribed, it doesn’t run as slow as I was afraid it…

  • |

    Linked – Mobile to the Mainstream

    You may want to bookmark this one from Craig Ball. “This article looks at simple, low-cost approaches to getting relevant and responsive mobile data into a standard e-discovery review workflow, and offers a Mobile Evidence Scorecard designed to start a dialogue leading to a consensus about what forms of mobile content should be routinely collected…

  • |

    How do Law Firms Become "Innovative"?

    Recently, I’ve had some conversation about the idea of whether a particular law firm is innovative or not. It’s a tough question to answer, in my mind, because it really depends on how you define innovative. Just having innovative technology in place does not make a firm innovative, yet at the same time, even the…

  • | |

    In-House Discovery?

    I’ve seen opinions on law firms doing e-discovery processing or collections in house, as opposed to farming that work out to a vendor that are about as varied and strongly held as the Presidential election. Some people think it’s a great value-add for clients, or even a revenue source, while others would never, ever, take…

  • Outlook

    The first bit of Office that I looked at was Outlook 2003. I spent a good portion of late Saturday night/Sunday morning learning about the differences and features. It took a little while to adjust to the 3 panes-across layout as opposed to the 1 pane on the left, two panes over top of each…

2 Comments

  1. Mail.app is going to have Exchange support in Snow Leopard, so I doubt there will be serious adoption of Outlook on OS X.

    Andrew

  2. That's fine for the people connected to Exchange, because we can always extract a mailbox from the Exchange server and not worry about Mac compatibilities. I'm more hoping those without Exchange will use it and not have to try and get email out of mail.app stores. That's kind of a pain. 🙂

    Probably won't happen though.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)