| |

Thoughts on ILTA12

Interestingly, I ran into a reader of the blog in one of our sessions last week at the ILTA 2012 Annual Conference. We briefly talked about the reasons behind my not writing about Litigation Support and eDiscovery, the biggest being the fact that I work for a vendor now, and am not exactly unbiased. 😉

So, since this was my first time at ILTA as a vendor, I talked just before going about what a different experience it would be, and it definitely was, including that conversation. One of the ways it was different was my inability to really get to many sessions, and also my inability to really tweet and/or blog about those sessions. Unlike being an attendee, being part of the support team for a vendor means a lot more working behind the scenes, a lot more talking with our clients, and just generally a lot more time spent outside the social sphere that you get when you’re a paid attendee. Simply put, we don’t get invited to all the parties, but we have our own party to be concerned with. That’s a big difference when you stop to think about it, and I think it sums up the week nicely.

Of course, I couldn’t resist the urge to mark down some thoughts on the conference, and on what I learned from talking to folks through the week. Like all my ediscovery blogging though, that post can now be found over at AccessData’s eDiscovery Insight Blog. Check it out, and let me know your thoughts on the growing power of ediscovery software and the need for continued training. Are we truly entering a new phase, or just expanding on the phase started years ago?

Similar Posts

  • False Proxies

    Seth Godin coined this term last week, describing situations where we crete a proxy measure for success, because the true goal is more difficult to measure. It struck a cord with me, because it seemed very, very similar to things I’ve said previously about working in tech support. Namely, that if you measure “success” as…

  • Dreaming

    I woke up this morning and realized that I had been dreaming about blogging. I’m not sure what that means but I doubt that it’s good. 🙂 Follow these topics: Uncategorized

  • What I’m Sharing (weekly)

    Here’s How You Want to Be Governing Enterprise Information: An Ounce of Prevention Is Worth a Pound in C A quarter of employees would upgrade their workplace technology if they were In charge Much Ado About Metadata? New Software? Facing Up to Training Hurdles The Most Effective Tech Tools for Lawyers? New Survey Says they…

  • RSSifying the Splash Page

    The last time I redesigned the blog to give folks the option of following just blog posts tagged as tech or litigation support, etc. I changed the front page on the site to a “splash” page, that just pointed to the various sections. (The “Many Faces…” if you will.) That never quite made me happy,…

  • Lit Support Links (weekly)

    EDRM Buyer’s Guide Part V – Collection tags: MM LitSupport The Technology Is Not the Issue, It’s How You Use It tags: LitSupport MM eDiscovery Best Practices: Issuing the Hold is Just the Beginning tags: LitSupport MM TRU Staffing Partners Announces Partnership with Leading Legal Technology Institutions tags: LitSupport MM eDiscovery Will Follow the Cloud…

  • Linked – Want to keep top talent? Create clear paths to advancement

    I’ve seen this fail so many times I can’t even begin to count them all. Mostly where they fail is that the career path is designed by someone who got where they are by taking path “A”, and so they design the same path for everyone else to follow. This is short-sighted for two reasons:?1. Not everyone is you. Not everyone wants to do the same things you have done or do now. (Over time those things you did 10-15 years ago may not even be relevant.)?2. That path winds to your job, so unless you are leaving, it has a dead-end built into it. Dead-ends cause retention problems.

One Comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)