|

Xerox Copiers Altering Documents

Apparently, Xerox scanners/photocopiers randomly alter numbers in scanned documents.

Naturally, I immediately wondered of any of those altered documents wound up involved in eDiscovery?

Update: Xerox has responded on their own blog. As I suspected, it wouldn’t be common for the characters to get changed as described in the first post, but you could certainly stumble into it and have some inaccuracies if you weren’t paying very close attention. Gladly Xerox will be issuing a patch, and explained how to set your device back to factory settings, where, apparently, the issue does not exist.

Similar Posts

  • Shared Links (weekly) Oct. 26, 2025

    For more like this, subscribe to the newsletter and get these links and more in your email.

  • Pay attention to the details!

    Looks like it is, in fact, AOL blocking Trillian. Gee and this is the company that’s suing MS for predatory business practices? I never have liked AOL as a company, they don’t help themselves any here. Geek Blog has a nice little wrap up of things he doesn’t like about BlogTrack. Personally I haven’t had…

  • Links (weekly)

    Conjecture is Not Spoliation « Bow Tie Law’s Blog tags: LitSupport MM E-Discovery is About Trust and Transparency – eDiscovery Insight tags: litsupport MM Technology-Assisted Review Hits Contract Lawyers tags: LitSupport MM Move Applications and Directories with SymMover tags: Tech MM “P” is for Processing: Part 2 tags: LitSupport MM In Electronic Discovery, Poorly Done…

  • |

    Linked – Deepfakes and fake media are coming for our memories

    This is going to be very real, very soon. And there’s no reason to think people are going to somehow learn to be more discerning that they are already. “Let’s put this all together. False memories fester when they make sense to our political worldview, when it’s familiar and repeated ad nauseam, when we trust…

  • Does Anyone Believe Meta Will Do This Well?

    This is the same company that has been accused of serving beauty ads to young women after it detected that they had deleted a selfie from their phones, and also of selling that to advertisers as a business model. 

    The same company that refuses to take down obviously dangerous and false information in the interest of “free speech absolutism” wants us to believe that it will protect people from online harassment now when it’s content created with their glasses specifically to stalk and harass them?

    Sorry, Adam, you don’t get that kind of benefit of the doubt. 

One Comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.