|

Linked – Why The 8-Hour Workday Doesn’t Work

“The ideal work-to-break ratio was 52 minutes of work, followed by 17 minutes of rest. People who maintained this schedule had a unique level of focus in their work. For roughly an hour at a time, they were 100% dedicated to the task they needed to accomplish. They didn’t check Facebook “real quick” or get distracted by emails. When they felt fatigue (again, after about an hour), they took short breaks, during which they completely separated themselves from their work. This helped them to dive back in refreshed for another productive hour of work.”

e030b20e2ef51c3e81584d04ee44408be273e7d51cb412429df9_640_teachingI’ve been thinking about this ratio in regards to training for awhile now. If focus is maximized at one hour followed by a 15 minute break, you would think training would be as well. In fact, I’d be willing to bet it is.

The problem though, from a training professional point of view, is how to convince customers that this is so. Giving classes a 15 minute break every hour would drag training into an extra day really. Instead of a 2 day course, you’d be looking at a 3 day course. You could probably learn twice as much stuff effectively in that extra 50 percent of class time, but what organization wants to dedicate more time to training their staff? Isn’t it hard enough to get them to do one day, let alone start dragging it out longer?

On the other hand, the companies that figure out the benefit of breaks in training and are willing to allow for more training time like this, may just end up with far more effective employees. But someone is going to have to try it first. Who wants to be on the cutting edge? 😉

http://www.forbes.com/sites/travisbradberry/2016/06/07/why-the-8-hour-workday-doesnt-work/

Similar Posts

  • What I’m Sharing (weekly) – May 17, 2020

    Underestimated: Law Firm Data Breaches Will our digital lives leave a fossil record? Don’t Bet the Farm on Slack Space Hackers Spoofing Zoom to Obtain Credentials and Passwords – Makes sense, who can keep track of which invites are real and which aren’t? 😉 Google Announces New, Free Digital Skills Training Sessions Online Here’s Another…

  • This Week’s Links (weekly)

    A Great Opportunity to Learn Litigation Tech and Presentation Skills tags: LitSupport MM Are You Scared Yet? – eDiscovery Horrors! tags: LitSupport MM 5 ways to reduce your e-discovery data set (and costs) tags: LitSupport MM Collecting Gmail for Preservation tags: LitSupport MM The Worst Thing That Can Happen to Training tags: training MM Abandoning…

  • |

    Linked: The problem isn’t remote working – it’s clinging to office-based practices

    Most things that I hear managers and CEO’s complain about remote working, like how their team feels disconnected, or suffers from “Zoom fatigue”, or might not be spending every minute of the 9-5 working for the company, are things that should have been true for those of us who worked remotely prior to 2020, but it wasn’t true.

    When you design, and manage, for remote work, instead of forcing everyone to be in more meaningless meetings just so you can “see” them, or track their activities every minute of the day, these issues don’t exist.

  • |

    Linked – Most IT pros have seen potentially embarrassing information about their colleagues

    “More than three-quarters of IT professionals have seen and kept secret potentially embarrassing information about their colleagues, according to new research conducted by AlienVault. The research, which surveyed the attitudes of more than 600 IT professionals into how they are treated, found that many are being called in to help get their colleagues out of…

  • |

    Happiness Lab On How Grades And Rewards are Manipulative

    One of the most popular arguments we hear, and one I’ve made myself, is that to truly stay informed, and avoid living in the bubble of our own political bias, we need to make sure we are getting information from a variety of sources, including ones we may not agree with.

    This study seems to be telling us that isn’t enough, and it can easily be manipulated. If I read an opposing viewpoint, and there’s no reward for doing so, I’m unlikely to really be influenced by it, but if I read an opposing viewpoint and get rewarded for it, I’m more likely to change my mind.

    Now, remember that emotional contagion we might get from social media? What if I shared one side of a political view, and got rewarded by the algorithms or whomever with lots of likes and comments, and the post got shared a whole bunch, but posts from the other side, got none of that? Which side am I more likely to agree with? Right, the one that I got better grades on. Not because it’s true, better, or more accurate, but because I am rewarded for thinking that way. Rewarded the way I’ve been my whole life, since I was a little boy, from the first time my parents wanted me to behave a certain way, all the way through my school years, and for all of my career.

    How hard would that be to fight against? Almost impossible, I’d say. How easy would it be for social media to do it, either the companies themselves, or large groups of users?

    How does that influence what we do see on social media?

  • |

    Linked: Five Skills That Help You Lead Remotely

    I like all of Kevin’s 5 skills, but this one to me is paramount because when I’ve been part of a remote team, every single failure ultimately came back to this: “Be a flexible communicator Certainly, leaders must be good communicators. But when your team is spread hither and yon, you must be proficient and…

One Comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.