Amazon logo on device
|

Linked – Litigation fears may make the Internet of Things more secure

If device makers think IoT security is expensive, they should consider what legal exposure might cost. Experts contemplate who might be found at fault when an IoT device causes harm.

I cannot imagine that there won’t be lawsuits coming over insecure devices. It will be an adventure, but the one thing I keep coming back to from this article is that there are tons and tons of IOT devices already out in the wild that are completely insecure. Yikes…

https://insights.hpe.com/articles/fear-of-litigation-may-be-key-to-security-on-the-internet-of-things-1703.html

Similar Posts

  • This Week’s Links (weekly)

    Across the pond to ILTA 2014 – a retrospective look part one tags: MM LitSupport ILTA 2014: What’s Next in Legal Technology tags: MM LitSupport 5 Photo Recovery Tools Tested and Reviewed tags: MM Tech Photography Imagining the future at ILTA 2014 | Unstructured tags: MM LitSupport Law firm innovation: Do or die tags: MM…

  • | | | |

    What I’m Sharing (weekly)

    It’s Time to Follow a Next-Generation E-Discovery Playbook New Study Shows that Misinformation Sees Significantly More Engagement than Real News on Facebook  We are the point of failure. Law’s Looming Skills Crisis How Executives Like Me Can Revolutionize Workplace Mental Health Emojis & eDiscovery: What Lawyers Need to Know Why Every State Should Require Technology…

  • |

    Linked: Lesser Included Emails in Threads Must Be Produced, Court Rules

    Essentially, if you’re not familiar with email threading, the idea is that if a group of people is sending emails back and forth by hitting the Reply button, and the previous email is copied into the body of the previous email, you don’t really have to read each individual email. At some point, later emails have the entire conversation in them. This means that it’s not necessary to read the “lesser included emails” because you already read them as part of the thread. But, the problem Judge Aaron describes is that while the text is there at the end of thread messages, you’re missing important metadata that is unique to the individual message.

    As I said, having worked with Teams messages often I have seen this, where a transcript doesn’t have all of the message metadata, especially the time/dates of each message versus the beginning or end of the chat. If you’re creating those transcripts and not including each message in your production, you might be running afoul of your production requirements.

    But, as I said, IANAL, so don’t take my word for it, do your own testing.

  • | |

    Deep Bench

    I was tuned in to a webinar yesterday by the Cowen Group when one of the speakers talked about the need for a deep bench in Litigation Support. Being a sports fan, I instantly understood exactly what she was saying. Her point was that the firm’s clients experience and expertise when it comes to e-discovery,…

  • | |

    Flickr Offering Terabyte of Photos for Free

    When I saw the announcement last night about Flickr now offering one terabyte of storage for their free accounts, I wondered just what it was that they would offer for those of us with Pro accounts to continue paying. It turns out, they aren’t offering much. The existing Pro accounts stay the same, but appear…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)