Data Visualized

Jarvis, Teach Me About eDiscovery Law

I’ve been meaning to write this post since I was following along with the ILTA Conference tweets a couple of weeks ago. I was struck by some of the things being shared during the keynotes about AI, specifically about the idea of learning modules that the team from IBM’s Watson project were talking about.

My mind immediately went to Tony Stark from the Iron Man movies and how when he needs to know something, he simply asks Jarvis, his artificial assistant. I could picture a day when a lawyer involved in a new case, who maybe wasn’t as experienced with that type of case, or that area of law, could simply ask Jarvis, and learn what they need to know.

If we think about how this plays out now, a young lawyer who wants to know how similar cases were handled and see what research had been done could, if they were working in a large firm, simply walk down the hall and ask another lawyer who had that knowledge. In fact, that is what most law firm’s KM projects are trying to bring about, making sure everyone knows who knows what.

That really is one of the bigger benefits of being in a firm, the variety of expertise and the ability to tap in to those resources as needed.

But, what if, instead of going down the hall, I could simply ask Jarvis to research the latest information and case law and summarize it for me? What if I could have Jarvis dig into past and current cases all over the country and tell me what works and what doesn’t?

How does that change the law firm dynamic? Sure, there would still be some benefits to working in a firm, and other benefits to working on your own, but Jarvis could make working out on your own, or in smaller firms, a bit easier. The AI assistant could replace legal research tools, help explain technology, and analyze documents and case law in mere minutes. It would obliterate the billable hour as a measure of worth, something that we’re already seeing occur around the industry. More importantly, how does this bring down the overall cost of legal work and improve the access to justice problem that we have in the US?

Change is coming, and I’ve talked many times about how we haven’t really thought through the ramifications of AI technology. Law firms would do well to be aware of these changes, and young lawyers would do well to be aware that these changes are coming, even if their firm management isn’t acknowledging them.

How do you see a Jarvis-like AI tool changing the way legal work is done? What does the future hold for big law firms when anyone can get access to AI?

Similar Posts

  • This Week’s Links (weekly)

    New LinkedIn App Connected Makes Networking Easy tags: MM SocNetPres Every American Will Experience This in Their Lifetime — Or Know Someone Who Will tags: MM Depression Keyloggers on Hotel Computers? Old News is New Again tags: Tech Security MM The Link Between E-Discovery and Information Governance tags: LitSupport MM Technical competence an ethical obligation in…

  • Lit Support Links (weekly)

    2012 Mid Year e-Discovery Technology Reflections: Much Ado about Buzz Words tags: LitSupport MM eDiscovery Does Not Mean Esoteric Discovery tags: LitSupport MM Taking a T.E.A.M. Approach to E-Discovery & Investigations tags: LitSupport MM eDiscovery Daily Blog: eDiscovery Careers: Achieving Success as a Non-Attorney in a Law Firm: Master Some Good Habits tags: litsupport MM…

  • | |

    Linked: Work burnout rises despite company investments in mental health

    As I’ve said before, many employers did the easy stuff. They invested in some mental health tools, promoted using employee assistance programs, talked more about mental health, heck they even gave people more time off or at least pushed people to actually use the time off they hadn’t been. And yet, here we are. Why?

    Because they haven’t yet done the hard work of making the workplace not the place that hurts mental health to start with. There’s no easy fix for that. It won’t happen in a few weeks, but if you don’t start looking at it, you’re going to find yourself without many employees to keep going. Because in 2021, people have options, and those options are only going to keep growing as younger generations make very different decisions about their careers than those of us in older generations are used to.

    The workplace will change one way or another. If your’s doesn’t want to, it will be killed.

  • This Week’s Links (weekly)

    New Survey Shows eDiscovery Workload, Predictive Coding Use Increasing tags: LitSupport MM Don’t Stipulate to Not Follow the Form of Production Rules tags: LitSupport MM ILTA 2014: Diversification the key for litigation support vendors ILTA 2014 reinforced my thinking that the future of eDiscovery is dynamically intertwined with privacy, security and governance. That has certain…

  • This Week’s Links (weekly)

    Your 60-Hour Work Week is Not a Badge of Honour tags: Management MM Ever wonder how digital forensics can be used in litigation? tags: LitSupport MM Forensics Summation Gets an A tags: LitSupport MM Don’t Forget to Produce Email Attachments tags: LitSupport MM Top 5 Practical Decision Points Related To Predictive Coding | IT-Lex tags: LitSupport…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)