Stats
|

Linked: A Return to the Office Doesn’t Have to Mean a Return to Boring Presentations

This is such an obvious thing, and yet I see it all of the time when someone is using PowerPoint.

“If someone throws text up on a screen, you’ll read it. You have no choice but to read it. You don’t choose to read it. You do it at a much deeper cognitive level of automaticity. Text –> Read. Ask a colleague not to read what you’re about to show them, then hold up a piece of paper with a word on it. They’ll read it because they can’t not read it. It’s what we do. Now, if you’re saying anything other than the text on your screen, your audience is receiving two competing messages and asking their cortices to multitask. We are not wired for that. If both messages are important, you will be losing some of the information from one or both sources you’re trying to transmit.”

The number of people who can read one thing and listen to another is very small. It might be zero. Our brains can’t process two different things that require our understanding simultaneously.

Of course, that also doesn’t mean that you just read your slides. That’s just boring. No one likes boring either.

Visuals. It’s all about the visuals.

A Return to the Office Doesn’t Have to Mean a Return to Boring Presentations

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)