Caribbean Island of Anguilla photographed from above.

Linked – ChatGPT in trouble with the EU (again)

This story seems inevitable to me. As the tech world pushes us increasingly into asking an AI chatbot for information instead of looking it up ourselves, and the AI model has incorrect information, where do you get it corrected?

When OpenAI was asked to correct or remove this misinformation, they said it was ‘technically impossible’ and also failed, when asked, to disclose information about how the data was processed, instead offering to simply filter or block data on certain prompts, related to the complainant.

Under GDPR law, people in the EU have rights about their personal information, including a right to have incorrect data, corrected. So, OpenAI’s refusal to remove or rectify the complainant’s information seems to be a direct breach of GDPR law.

If you understand how OpenAI built the language models for ChatGPT, it’s not hard to understand why it can’t just correct it. They didn’t create the incorrect information; they indexed it from millions of combined sources. (I know that’s not technically accurate to say they indexed it, but it’s close enough.)

The interesting thing about this is that the law was on the books. If you’re building an encyclopedia or online database of information, you have to provide a way for people to get their information corrected. OpenAI built a tool that couldn’t do that, completely ignoring that law. They more likely assumed it didn’t apply to them because what they did was more important than silly laws about public data.

As much as I enjoy learning about AI and thinking about the possibilities, there is this nagging doubt about it. That doubt comes from the fact that the people building these things do not account for obvious downsides. Ignoring this very basic GDPR requirement is one example.

Want another? How about a deep fake audio leaked onto social media of a principal making antisemitic remarks? Sure, months later, they’ve identified it as fake and arrested the high school athletic director. Still, that principal had to go into hiding, and even now, who knows what kind of unhinged person who hasn’t seen the update might do to them or their family?

Audio deep fakes were not only an obvious use of AI with audio but they are encouraged and advertised. Isn’t it fun to have Tom Hanks “say” something to your friends or audience during a presentation? This kind of misuse was going to happen. Eventually, someone is going to get killed because of it, much as someone will die after having AI-faked nudes or porn videos leaked.

Or how about some more fake audio of a BBC presenter used to sign an endorsement deal that she was never part of?

Again, technologists have unleashed this tool of the world and provided access to anyone who wants it for whatever purpose. Now, governments and other agencies are trying to play catchup. In the meantime, all of us are at risk of scammers, harassers, haters, and fake news outlets because of these tools. The companies that make them are so heavily invested in making sure they eventually turn a profit that the rest of these concerns are nothing. OpenAI, Google, Meta, Microsoft, etc., have poured trillions of dollars into AI. So what if a few million of us have to get harmed financially or physically? That’s nothing compared to the money they lose if they limit what AI can do.

So, we’ll see if Europe punished OpenAI for this disregard of its laws. We’ll see if the US can avoid major political upheaval due to fake political news during this election cycle. We’ll see if the world figures out how dangerous deep fake audio, photos, and video are to everyone. Or if they push all those concerns away to try to help these companies avoid massive losses from developing AI tools.

On the other hand, there is one place that is making a ton of money already from this AI hype:

The tiny island nation of Anguilla.

Revenue for dot ai domains grew from $7.4 million in 2021 to around $30 million in 2023. This year, Cate says that figure could be north of $50 million dollars — more than 40 percent of the country’s annual revenue. Most of that is from registration fees, which now cost $140 for a two-year contract. But some of it comes from auctions.

Good for you, Anguilla.

https://www.aitoolreport.com/articles/chatgpt-in-trouble-with-the-eu-again

Similar Posts

  • It keeps getting worse

    If you’re not in Ohio, maybe you haven’t paid much attention to the happenings of a certain intern and a stolen backup tape, so let me fill you in: – News reports a backup tape was stolen from an intern, working for the state’s, car. It is believed the tape has personal information, including SSN’s…

  • | |

    The First Rule…

    I was reading Josh Gilliland’s post from yesterday about being careful not to break client confidentiality in your online networking status messages. Here is how the risk of disclosure is possible: a Facebook user posts a status message they deem harmless, such as “I just landed ‘Company A’ as a client and have a bunch…

  • Linked – How Do You Encourage Your Team to Learn New Things

    If you truly want to be an organization that supports learning, you need to put your money where your mouth is and figure out how to incentivize individual and team learning opportunities. Taking the time to learn and the time to train others, shouldn’t come at a cost to the performance review of the people who want to learn. They should be the people you want to reward and hang on to. They are the ones who will be pivotal in helping you navigate change, but they can only do that if they still work for you. Making them work double-time to make up for “lost productivity” when they try to be part of the learning culture you claim to want won’t encourage them to hang around.

  • |

    Techshow Day 2 -CSI For Real: Science of Computer Forensics

    Craig Ball and John Simek Craig: a simple Walmart purchased hard drive holds more data than you can imagine. 80GB is a ton of stuff, and maybe 2/3 of what is on that drive is unreadable to you, so you can’t even be sure what it says. Even then, we’ve moved way beyond that. We’re…

  • Links (weekly)

    What the Fulbright Litigation Survey Says about E-Discovery tags: LitSupport MM “Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing” – Examining the new trend towards big e-discovery cost awards for winners tags: LitSupport MM Upcoming changes to Reader: a new look, new Google+ features, and some clean-up tags: Tech SocNetPres MM Producing Excel Spreadsheets as Tiffs…

  • This Week’s Links (weekly)

    Defendant Had Duty to Preserve Despite No Physical Possession of Documents tags: LitSupport MM Network forensics: The no-brainers tags: Security Tech MM Litigation 101 for eDiscovery Tech Professionals: Document Production: The Process tags: LitSupport MM Bow Tie Law’s 2012 eDiscovery Case Law Overview tags: LitSupport MM Free Utility to get an Inventory of Drives attached…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)