Hands holding a white mug with the words Like a Boss written in black cursive on it. The person holding it is wearing a black top.

Linked – Tell Employees What It Takes to Get a Promotion

This headline seems obvious. If you have an employee who has set a goal of being promoted to the next level of your organization, you should be able to tell them what is required. Yet, in many companies, it’s not that easy. There could be several reasons for this, but these are the ones I’ve seen and heard in my years:

  1. There is no formal process. They can’t explain getting promoted because no identifiable career ladder exists for their people. What’s the next step in your career path? It may not exist because no one has bothered to create it. Most of the time, this flows down: You can’t get promoted because the person you report to can’t get promoted, and so on. I see this often in law firms. There’s nowhere to move up in the IT, eDiscovery, Records, paralegal, and other areas unless the person above you moves first.
  2. The rules change. I’ve worked in places where the steps to be promoted were somewhat well-defined, only to watch them get twisted to fit a situation that management wanted to avoid. Most of the time, this has to do with titles and money, especially when bringing in someone with a title that didn’t fit their work. Nothing frustrates employees intending to get promoted like watching someone come in with the title they’ve been working hard to get but not meet any of the requirements they are working hard to meet. Worse yet, I’ve also seen situations where the roles were defined, only to discover that I was already meeting the requirements for a higher-level position and blocked from continuing that work to avoid promotion.
  3. The dreaded “Do the next job” requirement. If you work anywhere in tech, you’ve seen this. You can get that promotion by doing the next job while not getting paid for that job. Putting aside the possible wage theft involved (you get a level of work you’re not paying for.), it’s also likely impossible for an employee to meet that standard. They already have a job that they need to do. The “next” job might belong to someone who isn’t delegating it. Or, best of all, the next job might be managing people who don’t currently report to you. Good luck with all that.

That last one Sharlyn addresses in the article below, pointing out the obvious: If you’re a manager who wants to be promoted, you won’t get there without having a replacement ready.

One other important point is that not everyone wants to be promoted:

So, managers need to talk with employees about the future. This conversation can start during one-on-one meetings. It doesn’t have to wait for the annual performance review. Find out if the employee even wants a promotion. Some employees don’t and that’s okay. It doesn’t mean they won’t work hard and produce quality. Some employees do want a promotion and the manager needs to explain what it takes – both the technical requirements and the non-technical ones.

When we look at the requirements, especially the non-technical ones, we can often decide it isn’t for us. (That “do the next job” requirement, for example, would mean working a ton of extra hours to make sure your job is also getting done.) Whether it be travel requirements, after-hours requirements, location requirements, or something as simple as not wanting to manage, we all come to the workplace with our ideas about the relationship with paid work. Talking about these things is important because you want to know where someone is before deciding for them.

I would have to think long and hard about being a manager. I’m not sure it would fit with the life I want to have outside of work. I’ve also seen so many people “fail up” into management that I’ve become jaded about the whole process. This would be vital information if you plan on designing my career path.

It pays to know something about the people who work for you and what they want. If you don’t know what satisfies them with their careers, you’ll often replace them when they leave.

https://www.hrbartender.com/2024/leadership-and-management/promotion-conversations-workplace/

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Linked: Ongoing M365 Tenant Upgrades/Migrations

    It’s not normal for us to be using a platform that works one way, then changes and works another way two weeks later, but that is absolutely the way the Agile development is going to happen. The decision to change will be pushed by the business case for making the change, eDiscovery will be a second thought, if a thought at all.

    That means two things in my mind in addition to the things Greg lays out in his post below.

    1. You have to test, test, test. Constantly. You have to stay on top of new features, old feature changes, undocumented changes, etc.

    2. The legal industry as a whole is going to have to get a lot more comfortable with “good faith efforts” being a little more of a gray area as these changes get made. What we could collect easily before, may require a lot more time and effort today, or it may not be possible today because of a bug in a recent update.

    It’s going to happen. Whether you want to talk about M365, Google, cloud document management, cloud review platforms, or even cloud backups. Things will happen beyond our ability to control them, and those things will impact eDiscovery. Are we going to be OK accepting that?

  • |

    Solutions to the Law Firm Training Problem?

    Tami Schiller was kind enough to present a few ideas in the comments to that last post, and I definitely agree with what she had to say. In fact, the survey results themselves show some growth in the areas of alternative learning, with more firms using webcasts, podcasts and other time-shifted training tools. That will…

  • |

    Linked: Maybe You Don’t Have the Skills You Need to Manage Your Remote Workforce

    Suppose you or your management forces staff back into the office because you need the face-time. Or because you don’t think your team can collaborate, you don’t know who is being productive, etc. Instead of forcing it and running the risk of losing your best performers, ask yourself if what you need to do is manage differently.

    There’s no reason for promotions to be based on face time. With all of our technology, there is also no excuse for not collaborating or communicating effectively. Managing a remote team is not impossible. It’s just different. It requires that you change the way you manage.

  • This Week’s Links (weekly)

    The Reality Of Shooting In National Parks tags: MM Photography LinkedIn adding 2 members per second tags: socnetpres MM Five Reasons to Outsource Litigation Support tags: LitSupport MM We’re looking for a few good files The eDiscovery industry needs an updated set of standard files for testing. tags: LitSupport MM Marketing Litigation Support / E-Discovery…

  • What I’m Sharing (weekly)

    How To Keep Your Job While Dealing With Depression Court Infers Intentional, Bad Faith Spoliation From Use of Ephemeral Messaging E-Discovering the Use of Ephemeral Messaging Employers who spend more on their workers’ mental health make more money, Deloitte study finds Jonathan Bond: It’s time to stop working excessive hours and simply switch off Older…

  • |

    Linked: Does your remote team really need an in-person offsite?

    As the future of work settles in a bit, in the sense that we are now working remotely by choice more than by COVID requirement, we are seeing a large shift toward the desire to work remotely. I believe that shift is everyone listed above. For introverts, people with disabilities, people with adult or child care requirements, working remotely is bliss. (I did it even before COVID.) We can still do the other things that are important in our lives without being forced to a specific location, and we can do it without being forced to be in the same physical space as people we may or may not like.

    The problem is, and we see this clearly in the discussion below, doing things in-person is how we’ve always done things. The custom of having a quarterly or annual offsite was designed in a workplace that has always catered to extroverts and people who were available to be at the office for longer and longer hours. That culture has always excluded people. Think about the after-work drinks custom. How many moms got to attend instead of hurrying home to their kids, and how many men got to attend simply because somewhere there was a mom hurrying home to take care of the kids instead of them? How many introverted employees never showed up, or showed up out of a sense of guilt, quietly sipped their drink, and left as soon as it seemed polite to do so? And don’t even get me started on the number of employees in recovery who cannot, and should not, go out drinking with the group. 

    But, what did you hear about these events? They were great, we had a blast, we really got to bond with other folks from the team, etc. That feedback all comes from the minority that actually gets to go, and enjoys being in a group setting.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)