Red Letters Spelling out Fake

Linked – What You Need to Know About the Misinformation Effect

I work in the legal industry, so I am familiar with the fact that eyewitnesses are not always reliable sources of truth. This week, I learned how slight misinformation can cause eyewitnesses to blend what they hear and read into their memories.

An example of the misinformation effect in real life can be:
If you witness a car accident and later hear a news report suggesting that the driver was speeding. Even if you did not see the driver speeding, your mind will add this detail to your memory, making you believe it is true.

https://www.calmsage.com/what-is-the-misinformation-effect/

Consider how we are all inundated with misinformation in 2025. It’s overwhelming our brains and creating false memories. We see so much BS that we know isn’t true, but parts of it still integrate into what we know. Throw in a slight cognitive bias that leaves us susceptible to fake facts that reinforce what we already believe, and it’s a perfect shitstorm that causes intelligent people to recall “events” that never happened or massively incorrect details about the ones that did happen.

Because if you read enough misinformation, you can’t help but be influenced by it. The people who put out all this false information know it, too.

The only way to combat it is to ignore it. We must leave spaces where it occurs, cut ourselves off from people and sites promoting it, and never share anything we haven’t vetted with trustworthy fact-checkers. We need zero tolerance for ourselves when it comes to false information online.

That’s why websites like Snopes are so valuable. Just yesterday, I saw several false claims pop up in their RSS feed that I had seen shared on my social media feeds by people who should know better but reacted because they fit a preferred narrative. The thing is, it was a day or so before Snopes debunked them. The internet and social media present us with a false notion of time. Every outrageous thing that we see must be shared now when we would do ourselves and our mental health a massive favor by slowing down. Not only will this help us determine if the thing we are about to share is true, but it’ll help us be more mindful about going back to those sources again.

There’s enough stupidity going on in the world right now. We don’t need to add to it by sharing misinformation. The people pushing this on us deserve precisely none of our attention going forward. That’s how we fight it.

Similar Posts

  • Comments Change

    Not a major one, just a minor one. Since Blogger has added the ability to have the comment form be embedded underneath the post, I thought I’d try it out and save ya’ll a click when you wanted to leave a comment, maybe. Let’s see how this works… I think I like it, even the…

  • Password policy

    After my experiences today I’m reconsidering the way I look at password policies. I had to go around and install the new drivers for that Canon copier/printer today on about 15 machines. The install involved installing the Canon LPR port, installing the print driver, restarting, and then entering the Department ID information for the print…

  • Scoble’s at it again..

    So I took a look at Robert Scoble’s entries from last night and he says some interesting things. Of course he sounds exactly like you would expect a guy in NEC Sales to sound, which makes you wonder if he’s being honest or just a corporate shill, I’ve met Robert and I think he’s probably…

  • Would you Pay to use Twitter?

    Tim leaves out of his analysis accounting for how many users will no longer be there and how that much smaller user base impacts the value proposition. If I’m a journalist using Twitter to interact with readers and attract new readers to my publication, the ROI of paying for a fully-featured Twitter account includes considering how many people it helps me reach. Is it still worth it when my 250,000 followers get cut to 25,000? What about 2,500? What about less?

    Before you dismiss that as unlikely, I’d like you to remember that recent Pew research found that “the top 25% of users by tweet volume produce 97% of all tweets, while the bottom 75% of users produce just 3%, according to an analysis conducted over a three-month period in 2021.”

    I’m going to just assume that the 75% group who isn’t tweeting very often is not going to pay for Twitter. Of the other 25% we have to consider how many of them will fall into the $12 per year plan because they already don’t follow many people but use Twitter to interact with people who want to follow them. The question is, will those followers still exist? And if they don’t exist, is Twitter still a global conversation? Or is it just another place for privileged people who pay for membership to talk to each other?

  • Famous last words

    “All I did was try to download a Solitaire game from the Internet” Anyone who’s ever helped someone clean up a spyware infestation knows exactly what I’m talking about. One “innocent” little game came complete with 8 toolbars, 4 startup executables, 3 advertising generators, multiple registry entries, random processes and, ironically enough, an anti-spam program that…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)