| |

Failure to Communicate

This is a bit of a follow-up to a post a few days ago about whether having an open ticketing system would help with the communications between techs and the users they support.

As I mentioned there, and talked more about in the comments, when you have systemic failure to communicate, it’s much more than a technical problem. It’s a people problem, and in many cases, it’s a cultural problem. If your organization sees its IT department as “those” people down in the basement, you are going to continue to have these issues with people not giving the techs enough information. Conversely, if your IT folks see the people they support as (l)users, you are going to continue to have issues with your techs not following up appropriately.

Worse yet, when these attitudes are displayed by the CEO, or the IT manager, there is no hope of it getting better, no matter what technology you put in place! If your IT department is in its own silo, you’re going to have problems. If all the other departments are in their own silos, you’re going to have problems that go well beyond tech support. From what I hear, this is actually pretty common in larger law firms, as each practice area tends to be in its own silo, not to mention staff departments, like IT, which exist even outside of those practice area silos!

As I’ve written elsewhere recently, there are some things you can do, even if you’re not in management, that will help. First and foremost, do some internal networking. Get to know people in other areas, and develop relationships outside of the silo. Learn about what is happening in other areas of the firm and try to find ways in which your talents, or technology, can assist them in accomplishing things that are important to them.

Don’t wait for management to develop a plan to get rid of silos, do it yourself on whatever level you can. Go to lunch with someone in another area of the firm, and offer to show them how to use some bit of technology during a brown bag lunch. I’ve had some success offering to show people how to set up an RSS reader, for example. It’s not official firm-approved technology training, it’s taking my own time to help teach someone how to use a technology that could help them, with their job, or with other interests.

One other area where I’ve only recently begun to consider is in the use of social networking tools. As I’ve been on Facebook for a little while now, I’m realizing just how much it’s growing in use, even among the non-techie people I know. In some cases, they are joining up to keep an eye on their teenaged kids, and finding plenty of old friends/classmates on the service, or are using it to connect with family members who are far away, possibly as a way to share photos, and then finding plenty of other groups and activities they enjoy, etc. Lots of these folks are also listing their work information, including employers.

I can’t help but wonder if “friending” some of these folks would help me to learn about their interests, and find common ground, or maybe increase the level of interaction with folks who I don’t normally get to see on a regular basis. At this point, I’ve only connected with a handful of folks that I work with on Facebook, and none on Twitter, but I’m wondering if I should spend some time tracking down more of them, and using the technology to develop better relationships across silos. (Doing so without coming across as a creepy stalker guy from Lit Support might be a little difficult though..*L*)

To me, a lack of communication in any business is a sign of a lack of relationships within that organization. People who know each other, are familiar with each other, and heck maybe even like each other, are more likely to share important information. People who don’t know each other, or who couldn’t even tell you the name of the IT person who helped them, aren’t.

Of course, since I met my wife at work 9 years ago, maybe my perspective on building relationships at work is a bit biased. I tend to think the better you know the people you work with, the better you are going to communicate with them, and they with you. It’s worked that way for me with plenty of folks that I didn’t wind up married to as well. 🙂

What do you guys think? Do you regularly connect with folks from within your organization outside of work? If you work in a law firm, what chance do you think an internal networking goal has of getting any sort of momentum with people who are ruled by billable hours? I will say, it’s been easier to build relationships with other staff members than it has been with lawyers. That is one silo that is going to be difficult to reach across, it takes time, and that’s time that isn’t being billed! Share your own thoughts in the comments…

Tags: Communication, HelpDesk

Similar Posts

  • What I’m Sharing (weekly)

    Americans want an internet bill of rights to protect their online data/a> Amid Increasing Remote Work, E-Discovery Contends With an Overstretched Internet Will 2020 see the end of Keywords in eDiscovery? An Open Letter From Your Lawyer: We Don’t Know What We’re Doing. Unchecked Smart Cities are Surveillance Cities. What We Need are Smart Enough…

  • Does Remote Work Make It Obvious Who is Getting Work Done?

    Regarding technology flattening the organization, I would agree with Ed. Where I’m going to disagree is in assuming every workplace has figured that out and taken advantage of it. 

    Bad managers are still bad managers, even if they are remote. If the management style at your company is to measure work by, what Ed calls, the “appearance of work”, you’ve probably struggled with remote work. Or, you’ve got everyone in meetings, or at least available online all day, every day. On the other hand, if you’ve switched to remote work and also switched the way you measure your directs, you’ve probably been very successful and might even be willing to accept remote work permanently. It’s all about understanding that what we do with teams when they work in-person doesn’t work with remote teams and adjusting. 

    Remote work isn’t compatible with management that measures workers by the hours they spend at their desks or how many people like you. Those measurements kind of go out the window. So it would be best if you had new, better measurements. I’d argue that you need the measurement you should have always been using, but I digress. 

  • | |

    Linked – Taking an Honest Look at Your Data Health

    Tish is absolutely on point here: A healthy data posture includes a documented and current information map that says what you have, where it’s stored, and who has access to it. Beyond an information map, you need to be able to collect, search, understand, and protect those data assets that are critical to the operation…

  • Would you Pay for Tweetdeck or Advanced Twitter Features?

    If they really want to charge for Tweetdeck, it needs to be treated like a commercial product. Since they brought it in years ago, Twitter has basically just left it sitting on the shelf. There hasn’t been a lot of development, there’s no longer an iOS app, and some native Twitter features, like deleting a tweet, aren’t integrated with Tweetdeck. So, if you’re looking to make some money by charging for Tweetdeck, I get it, but I’m gonna need a little more effort from you Twitter.

  • This Week’s Links (weekly)

    Travel delays ahead: FAA furloughs begin soon tags: travel MM New Federal E-Discovery Rules Move a Step Closer to Fruition tags: LitSupport MM Are We on the Cusp of Major Changes to E-Discovery Rules? tags: LitSupport MM Flight Search Engines And The Multi-City Ripoff tags: MM travel 20 eDiscovery Blogs for Legal Professionals to Follow…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)